Striking Phenotypic Variation yet Low Genetic Differentiation in Sympatric Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush)

dc.contributor.authorKia Marin
dc.contributor.authorAndrew Coon
dc.contributor.authorRobert Carson
dc.contributor.authorPaul V. Debes
dc.contributor.authorDylan J. Fraser
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biologian laitos|en=Department of Biology|
dc.converis.publication-id29766637
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/29766637
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:45:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:45:27Z
dc.description.abstractThe study of population differentiation in the context of ecological speciation is commonly assessed using populations with obvious discreteness. Fewer studies have examined diversifying populations with occasional adaptive variation and minor reproductive isolation, so factors impeding or facilitating the progress of early stage differentiation are less understood. We detected non-random genetic structuring in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) inhabiting a large, pristine, postglacial lake (Mistassini Lake, Canada), with up to five discernible genetic clusters having distinctions in body shape, size, colouration and head shape. However, genetic differentiation was low (FST = 0.017) and genetic clustering was largely incongruent between several population- and individual-based clustering approaches. Genotype- and phenotype-environment associations with spatial habitat, depth and fish community structure (competitors and prey) were either inconsistent or weak. Striking morphological variation was often more continuous within than among defined genetic clusters. Low genetic differentiation was a consequence of relatively high contemporary gene flow despite large effective population sizes, not migration-drift disequilibrium. Our results suggest a highly plastic propensity for occupying multiple habitat niches in lake trout and a low cost of morphological plasticity, which may constrain the speed and extent of adaptive divergence. We discuss how factors relating to niche conservatism in this species may also influence how plasticity affects adaptive divergence, even where ample ecological opportunity apparently exists.
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.jour-issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.olddbid178745
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/161839
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/36311
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0162325
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042718785
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, Biologian laitoksen yhteiset
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0162325
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issue9
dc.relation.volume11
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/161839
dc.titleStriking Phenotypic Variation yet Low Genetic Differentiation in Sympatric Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush)
dc.year.issued2016

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
5.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF