Insect oviposition preference between Epichloe-symbiotic and Epichloe-free grasses does not necessarily reflect larval performance

dc.contributor.authorLaihonen M
dc.contributor.authorSaikkonen K
dc.contributor.authorHelander M
dc.contributor.authorTammaru T
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun yliopiston biodiversiteettiyksikkö|en=Biodiversity Unit of the University of Turku|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85536774202
dc.contributor.organization-code2606017
dc.converis.publication-id48520585
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/48520585
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:53:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:53:52Z
dc.description.abstractVariation in plant communities is likely to modulate the feeding and oviposition behavior of herbivorous insects, and plant-associated microbes are largely ignored in this context. Here, we take into account that insects feeding on grasses commonly encounter systemic and vertically transmitted (via seeds) fungal Epichloe endophytes, which are regarded as defensive grass mutualists. Defensive mutualism is primarily attributable to alkaloids of fungal origin. To study the effects of Epichloe on insect behavior and performance, we selected wild tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and red fescue (Festuca rubra) as grass-endophyte models. The plants used either harbored the systemic endophyte (E+) or were endophyte-free (E-). As a model herbivore, we selected the Coenonympha hero butterfly feeding on grasses as larvae. We examined both oviposition and feeding preferences of the herbivore as well as larval performance in relation to the presence of Epichloe endophytes in the plants. Our findings did not clearly support the female's oviposition preference to reflect the performance of her offspring. First, the preference responses depended greatly on the grass-endophyte symbiotum. In F. arundinacea, C. hero females preferred E+ individuals in oviposition-choice tests, whereas in F. rubra, the endophytes may decrease exploitation, as both C. hero adults and larvae preferred E- grasses. Second, the endophytes had no effect on larval performance. Overall, F. arundinacea was an inferior host for C. hero larvae. However, the attraction of C. hero females to E+ may not be maladaptive if these plants constitute a favorable oviposition substrate for reasons other than the plants' nutritional quality. For example, rougher surface of E+ plant may physically facilitate the attachment of eggs, or the plants offer greater protection from natural enemies. Our results highlight the importance of considering the preference of herbivorous insects in studies involving the endophyte-symbiotic grasses as host plants.
dc.format.pagerange7242
dc.format.pagerange7249
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758
dc.identifier.jour-issn2045-7758
dc.identifier.olddbid185035
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/168129
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41082
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6450
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824138
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaihonen, Miika
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSaikkonen, Kari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHelander, Marjo
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1002/ece3.6450
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEcology and Evolution
dc.relation.issue14
dc.relation.volume10
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/168129
dc.titleInsect oviposition preference between Epichloe-symbiotic and Epichloe-free grasses does not necessarily reflect larval performance
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
ece3.6450.pdf
Size:
543.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF