A Rasch analysis of the self-administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-FHAI)

dc.contributor.authorStolt Minna
dc.contributor.authorKottorp Anders
dc.contributor.authorSuhonen Riitta
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.converis.publication-id66419042
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/66419042
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:32:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:32:28Z
dc.description.abstract<h3>Background</h3><p>Reliable and valid measurement is the foundation of evidence-based practice. The self-administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-FHAI) was recently developed to measure patients’ evaluations of their own foot health. Evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the S-FHAI is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate those properties by using a Rasch analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This methodological study analysed secondary data that was collected from nurses (<em>n</em> = 411) in 2015. The psychometric properties of the S-FHAI were evaluated using the Rasch model. Unidimensionality was analysed first, followed by item functioning, person misfit and differential item functioning (DIF).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The S-FHAI demonstrated evidence of unidimensionality, with an acceptable item fit according to the Rasch model. Person fit and person separation were low, however, indicating restricted separation among different respondents. Item separation was high, demonstrating clear discrimination between the items. No DIF was detected in relation to gender, but significant DIF was demonstrated in relation to age for 6 of the 25 items.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The S-FHAI has potential for use in investigating self-reported foot health. The Rasch analysis revealed that the psychometric properties of the instrument were acceptable, although some issues should be addressed to improve the scale. In future, it may be beneficial to analyse the sensitivity of the items and to test the S-FHAI in more diverse patient populations.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6955
dc.identifier.jour-issn1472-6955
dc.identifier.olddbid188867
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/171961
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/56558
dc.identifier.urlhttps://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-021-00625-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021100750296
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorStolt, Minna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSuhonen, Riitta
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12912-021-00625-z
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Nursing
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume20
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/171961
dc.titleA Rasch analysis of the self-administered Foot Health Assessment Instrument (S-FHAI)
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12912-021-00625-z.pdf
Size:
644.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version