Comparing methods for the long-term performance assessment of bifacial photovoltaic modules in Nordic conditions

dc.contributor.authorKarttunen Lauri
dc.contributor.authorJouttijärvi Sami
dc.contributor.authorPoskela Aapo
dc.contributor.authorPalonen Heikki
dc.contributor.authorHuerta Hugo
dc.contributor.authorTodorović Milica
dc.contributor.authorRanta Samuli
dc.contributor.authorMiettunen Kati
dc.contributor.organizationfi=materiaalitekniikka|en=Materials Engineering|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.80931480620
dc.contributor.organization-code2610202
dc.converis.publication-id181759889
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/181759889
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:54:33Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:54:33Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The main objective of this study is to discover which performance loss rate (PLR) calculation methods provide the most reliable results for vertical bifacial photovoltaics (VBPV) in Nordic conditions. For this purpose, over 1600 filter-metric-aggregation-model combinations for PLR calculation are compared. Accurate determination of PLR is crucial for estimating the economic profitability of a PV system, but standardized methodology is lacking as is the understanding on how the common PLR calculation frameworks perform for both VBPV technology and Nordic climatic region. Here, four-year, minute-resolution datasets from adjacent VBPV modules and a weather station in Turku, Finland (60◦N) are used. After removing crude outliers, a benchmark PLR of − 1.46 ± 0.03 %/year was obtained by averaging the remaining over 1200 filter-metric-aggregation-model combinations. The year-on-year method with a daily/weekly aggregated temperature- and irradiance-corrected performance model was found robust and reliable to Nordic high seasonality. In contrast, several commonly used methods, such as the PVUSA model, produced unrealistic results. Unexpectedly, temperature correction increased the seasonal pattern of the performance ratio, and PLR varied with irradiance conditions and between the front and rear sides of the module. This work expands the best practices of PLR calculation to complement the development of global PLR calculation standards.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0682
dc.identifier.jour-issn0960-1481
dc.identifier.olddbid204845
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187872
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53548
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119473
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790565
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarttunen, Lauri
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJouttijärvi, Sami
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPoskela, Aapo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPalonen, Heikki
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTodorovic, Milica
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMiettunen, Kati
dc.okm.discipline216 Materials engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline216 Materiaalitekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber119473
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.renene.2023.119473
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRenewable Energy
dc.relation.issuePart 1
dc.relation.volume219
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187872
dc.titleComparing methods for the long-term performance assessment of bifacial photovoltaic modules in Nordic conditions
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0960148123013885-main.pdf
Size:
9.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format