Comparison of cold season sedimentation dynamics in the non-tidal estuary of the Northern Baltic Sea

Abstract

<p><br></p><p>In this study, we investigated sedimentation differences between two distinctive cold seasons, in terms of hydrometeorological and hydrodynamic conditions, in a coastal area of the Northern Baltic Sea in 2018–2020. A combination of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/sediment-trap" title="Learn more about sediment trap from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">sediment trap</a> data, hydrometeorological data and hydrodynamic modelling provided a unique set-up to discover differences in <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/sedimentation-rate" title="Learn more about sedimentation rates from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">sedimentation rates</a> and compositions. Our study shows that the averaged sedimentation accumulation rate (SAR) was nearly three times higher during warmer cold season (30.9 g m−2 day−1), characterised by higher precipitation, especially rain and discharge, as well as snowless and open water conditions, compared to regular cold season (10.6 g m−2 day−1). While sedimentation was higher during the warmer season, the mean sediment grain size (D50) was higher during the regular cold season with permanent snow and ice cover. Similarly, while sediments of the regular cold season were organically rich, the total amount of organic matter accumulation was larger during the warmer cold season. Sediments consisted mostly of clastic matter (85–89%), of which the mean grain size varied from clay to fine silt (0.3–3.0 μm). Sedimentation differences between the cold seasons can be explained by differences in precipitation, river flow, wind-induced <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/resuspension" title="Learn more about resuspension from ScienceDirect's AI-generated Topic Pages">resuspension</a> and a low air pressure system forcing sea level changes. Sedimentation differences along the study bay were found to be connected to channel cross-sectional area and flow conditions caused by river input and sea level changes.</p>