Occupational radiation doses in CT-guided interventions: A multicentre evaluation with special emphasis on lung biopsies and eye lens doses

dc.contributor.authorHartikainen, Hemmo
dc.contributor.authorPekkarinen, Antti
dc.contributor.authorKaasalainen, Touko
dc.contributor.authorKortesniemi, Mika
dc.contributor.organizationfi=materiaalitutkimuksen laboratorio|en=Materials Research Laboratory|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=fysiikan ja tähtitieteen laitos|en=Department of Physics and Astronomy|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.15561262450
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.55477946762
dc.converis.publication-id526606392
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/526606392
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-31T20:12:24Z
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to investigate eye lens and whole-body radiation doses received by interventional<br>radiologists during CT-guided procedures, with a particular focus on lung biopsies.<br></p><p><b>Methods:</b> Simultaneous measurements of eye lens dose equivalent Hp(3), deep-dose equivalent Hp(10), and<br>shallow-dose equivalent Hp(0.07) were conducted under clinical conditions during CT-guided procedures in five<br>Finnish hospitals during four separate four-week measurement periods. Hp(3) was measured using EYE-D ther-moluminescent dosimeters, while Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) were recorded using DIS-1 dosimeters. The Hp(3)/Hp(10) and Hp(3)/Hp(0.07) ratios, and Hp(3) to dose-length product (DLP) were analysed to assess whether routinely measured quantities can provide a rough indication of eye lens dose in CT-guided procedures. The doses per CT procedure were analysed for all aforementioned dose equivalents to evaluate the annual exposures. Dosimeter calibration and quality control were performed at a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory. Staff positioning, radiation protection practices, and procedural variables were explored in relation to differences in observed exposure levels across hospitals and procedures.<br></p><p><b>Results and conclusions:</b> Occupational radiation exposure during CT-guided procedures were generally negligible when appropriate radiological practices and protective equipment were used. One hospital showed significantly higher dose values due to the primary use of fluoroscopy and absence of a lead glass screen. Despite this aberrant result, exposure levels remained below annual occupational dose limits in all hospitals. Routinely measured Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) showed a strong relationship with Hp(3) in the measurable dose data, suggesting that they may provide a rough indication of the order of magnitude of eye lens dose.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1724-191X
dc.identifier.jour-issn1120-1797
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/62839
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179726001201?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe20260622101677
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHartikainen, Hemmo
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biomedicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biolääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline114 Physical sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline114 Fysiikkafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisher.countryItalyen_GB
dc.publisher.countryItaliafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeIT
dc.relation.articlenumber105833
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.ejmp.2026.105833
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPhysica Medica
dc.relation.volume148
dc.titleOccupational radiation doses in CT-guided interventions: A multicentre evaluation with special emphasis on lung biopsies and eye lens doses
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S1120179726001201-main.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format