Is beauty-based inequality gendered? A systematic review of gender differences in socioeconomic outcomes of physical attractiveness in labor markets

dc.contributor.authorKukkonen Iida
dc.contributor.authorPajunen Tero
dc.contributor.authorSarpila Outi
dc.contributor.authorÅberg Erica
dc.contributor.organizationfi=INVEST tutkimuskeskus ja lippulaiva|en=INVEST Research Flagship Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=taloussosiologia|en=Economic Sociology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.11531668876
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.82939713796
dc.contributor.organization-code2603304
dc.contributor.organization-code2603401
dc.converis.publication-id179734741
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/179734741
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:13:41Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:13:41Z
dc.description.abstractDuring the past decade, academic interest in physical attractiveness-based social inequalities has spread significantly beyond the United States to Europe. In previous research, however, there has been no consensus on whether the socioeconomic outcomes of physical attractiveness are gendered. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to determine to what extent and how the socioeconomic outcomes of physical appearance in labor markets are gendered. A total of 58 articles were reviewed after searching through five databases and identifying relevant articles. The results show that, in general, more attractive individuals are socioeconomically favored, which is true for both men and women. The number of studies that claim that attractiveness is more beneficial for women is almost equal to the number of studies that claim it is more beneficial for men. Moreover, while the socioeconomic outcomes for men are somewhat consistent, the outcomes for women appear to be more inconsistent; only women appear to be both rewarded and penalized for being attractive. Therefore, we conclude that contextual factors play a greater role in attractiveness-related outcomes, especially for women, than previously assumed.
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8307
dc.identifier.jour-issn1461-6696
dc.identifier.olddbid205420
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188447
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54372
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2210202
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786991
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKukkonen, Iida
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPajunen, Tero
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSarpila, Outi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorÅberg, Erica
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1080/14616696.2023.2210202
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEuropean Societies
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188447
dc.titleIs beauty-based inequality gendered? A systematic review of gender differences in socioeconomic outcomes of physical attractiveness in labor markets
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Is beauty based inequality gendered A systematic review of gender differences in socioeconomic outcomes of physical attractiveness in labor markets.pdf
Size:
2.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format