The behavioral immune system and vaccination intentions during the coronavirus pandemic

dc.contributor.authorKarlsson Linda C
dc.contributor.authorSoveri Anna
dc.contributor.authorLewandowsky Stephan
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson Linnea
dc.contributor.authorKarlsson Hasse
dc.contributor.authorNolvi Saara
dc.contributor.authorKarukivi Max
dc.contributor.authorLindfelt Mikael
dc.contributor.authorAntfolk Jan
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.16217176722
dc.converis.publication-id68409198
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/68409198
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:23:34Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:23:34Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The behavioral immune system is considered to be a psychological adaptation that decreases the risk of infection. Research suggests that, in the current environment, this system can produce attitudes with negative health consequences, such as increased vaccine hesitancy. In three studies, we investigated whether two facets of the behavioral immune system—germ aversion (i.e., aversion to potential pathogen transmission) and perceived infectability (i.e., perceived susceptibility to disease)—predicted intentions to accept COVID-19 and influenza vaccination during the pandemic. The behavioral immune system mechanisms were measured before the COVID-19 pandemic in one study, and during the pandemic in two. In contrast to previous research, those with higher germ aversion during the pandemic perceived vaccines to be safer and had higher intentions to accept vaccination. Germ aversion before the pandemic was not associated with vaccination intentions. Individuals who perceived themselves as more susceptible to disease were slightly more willing to accept vaccination. We conjecture that high disease threat reverses the relationship between the behavioral immune system response and vaccination. As the associations were weak, individual differences in germ aversion and perceived infectability are of little practical relevance for vaccine uptake.<br></p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn0191-8869
dc.identifier.olddbid209031
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192058
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38393
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111295
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022021619511
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Linda
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSoveri, Anna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Linnea
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarlsson, Hasse
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNolvi, Saara
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKarukivi, Max
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber111295
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.paid.2021.111295
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPersonality and Individual Differences
dc.relation.volume185
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192058
dc.titleThe behavioral immune system and vaccination intentions during the coronavirus pandemic
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Karlsson22 BIS.pdf
Size:
762.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format