Platelet inhibition strategies in rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy: a large retrospective multicenter registry

dc.contributor.authorAnastasiou Aikaterini
dc.contributor.authorBrehm Alex
dc.contributor.authorKaesmacher Johannes
dc.contributor.authorMujanovic Adnan
dc.contributor.authorde Dios Lascuevas Marta
dc.contributor.authorCarmona Fuentes Tomás
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Frías Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo Valverde Blanca
dc.contributor.authorBerlis Ansgar
dc.contributor.authorMaurer Christoph J.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen Thanh N.
dc.contributor.authorAbdalkader Mohamad
dc.contributor.authorKlein Piers
dc.contributor.authorThevoz Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorMichel Patrik
dc.contributor.authorBartolini Bruno
dc.contributor.authorKaschner Marius
dc.contributor.authorWeiss Daniel
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre Andrea M.
dc.contributor.authorPedicelli Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorMachi Paolo
dc.contributor.authorBernava Gianmarco
dc.contributor.authorKuwahara Shuntaro
dc.contributor.authorUchida Kazutaka
dc.contributor.authorWenderoth Jason
dc.contributor.authorJoshi Anirudh
dc.contributor.authorKarwacki Grzegorz
dc.contributor.authorBolognese Manuel
dc.contributor.authorTessitore Agostino
dc.contributor.authorVinci Sergio Lucio
dc.contributor.authorCervo Amedeo
dc.contributor.authorRollo Claudia
dc.contributor.authorHui Ferdinand
dc.contributor.authorMozumder Aaisha Siddiqua
dc.contributor.authorRomano Daniele Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorFrauenfelder Giulia
dc.contributor.authorGoyal Nitin
dc.contributor.authorBatra Vivek
dc.contributor.authorInoa Violiza
dc.contributor.authorCognard Christophe
dc.contributor.authorHoferica Matúš
dc.contributor.authorRautio Riitta
dc.contributor.authorKaiser Daniel P. O.
dc.contributor.authorGerber Johannes C.
dc.contributor.authorClarke Julian
dc.contributor.authorLevitt Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorWolf Marcel N.
dc.contributor.authorOthman Ahmed E.
dc.contributor.authorScarcia Luca
dc.contributor.authorKalsoum Erwah
dc.contributor.authorMelancia Diana
dc.contributor.authorSousa Diana Aguiar de
dc.contributor.authorGanimede Maria Porzia
dc.contributor.authorSemeraro Vittorio
dc.contributor.authorGiordano Flavio
dc.contributor.authorMuto Massimo
dc.contributor.authorKatsanos Aristeidis
dc.contributor.authorBonala Umesh
dc.contributor.authorTuladhar Anil M.
dc.contributor.authorJenniskens Sjoerd F. M.
dc.contributor.authorHellstern Victoria
dc.contributor.authorKleffner Ilka
dc.contributor.authorRemida Paolo
dc.contributor.authorDiamanti Susanna
dc.contributor.authorRenieri Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorBallabio Elena
dc.contributor.authorValvassori Luca
dc.contributor.authorRommers Nikki
dc.contributor.authorKatan Mira
dc.contributor.authorSchulze-Zachau Victor
dc.contributor.authorPsychogios Marios-Nikos
dc.contributor.organizationfi=lääketieteellinen tiedekunta|en=Faculty of Medicine|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.13290506867
dc.converis.publication-id504593740
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/504593740
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:26:23Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:26:23Z
dc.description.abstract<div><p><strong>Background: </strong> Rescue stenting (RS) is a bailout strategy for failed thrombectomy. Optimal platelet inhibition strategy after RS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to describe and compare different platelet inhibition strategies during/after RS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong> Retrospective cohort study across 34 international centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients with large vessel occlusion and RS after failed thrombectomy (2019-2023) were included. Periprocedural and postprocedural platelet inhibition strategies were described and compared, focusing on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors, single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We assessed the effects of platelet inhibition strategy and potentially covariates on the primary outcome of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) using ordinal shift analysis with proportional odds models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> RS was performed in 589 patients (mean age 67.9 years, 60.8% male). Numerous combinations of platelet inhibitors were administered. Periprocedural GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 61.5% of patients. Postprocedural DAPT was administered to 80.5% and SAPT to 13.3%. Functional independence (mRS 0-2) was achieved in 40.7%, while 26.3% died within 90 days. Stent occlusion occurred in 20.5%, with 67.6% of these occlusions within 24 h. Postprocedural stent-occlusion was independently associated with worse functional outcome at 90 days (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3-7.2, <em>p</em> < 0.001). No significant association between periprocedural GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors, and 90-day mRS or stent occlusion was found. Postprocedural SAPT was associated with worse functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.0, <em>p</em> = 0.02), higher mortality (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.05-4.0, <em>p</em> = 0.03), and increased stent occlusion rates (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 2.3-9.7, <em>p</em> < 0.001) compared to postprocedural DAPT. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 6.8% of patients, with no significant difference between antiplatelet regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Extensive heterogeneity exists in platelet inhibition strategies following RS. Stent occlusion is associated with worse clinical outcomes, and the first 24 h post-RS are critical for stent patency. Compared to SAPT, DAPT was associated with better functional outcome, lower mortality, and lower stent occlusion rates.<br></p></div>
dc.identifier.eissn1756-2864
dc.identifier.jour-issn1756-2856
dc.identifier.olddbid212487
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195505
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/52256
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251360913
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216949
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRautio, Riitta
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline217 Medical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurosciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline217 Lääketieteen tekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3112 Neurotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumber17562864251360913
dc.relation.doi10.1177/17562864251360913
dc.relation.ispartofjournalTherapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
dc.relation.volume18
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195505
dc.titlePlatelet inhibition strategies in rescue stenting after failed thrombectomy: a large retrospective multicenter registry
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
anastasiou-et-al-2025-platelet-inhibition-strategies-in-rescue-stenting-after-failed-thrombectomy-a-large-retrospective.pdf
Size:
521.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format