Factors influencing resilience and its relationship with spiritual coping strategies among nursing college students: a latent profile analysis

dc.contributor.authorHu, Shuang
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Siying
dc.contributor.authorYang, Qizhi
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Ting
dc.contributor.authorShumaila, Batool
dc.contributor.authorXian, Yajing
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Hongyang
dc.contributor.authorXu, Dandan
dc.contributor.authorHu, Huiping
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xianhong
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.converis.publication-id499569972
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/499569972
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:41:45Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:41:45Z
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Background</b><br>Previous studies have primarily examined overall resilience about coping strategies and demographics, overlooking individual heterogeneity. This study identifies distinct resilience profiles among nursing students, examines their associations with spiritual coping strategies, and determines demographic factors associated with these profiles.</p><p><b>Method</b><br>A cross-sectional study of 1,223 nursing students was conducted using convenience sampling from May 13 to 24, 2024. Latent profile analysis identified resilience subgroups, while the Bolck-Croon-Hagenaars approach assessed how spiritual coping strategies varied across profiles. The Three-Step Approach for Auxiliary Variables evaluated demographic predictors.</p><p><b>Result</b><br>Four resilience profiles emerged: low resilience-low strength (Profile 1), low resilience-balanced development (Profile 2), high resilience-balanced development (Profile 3), and high resilience-high tenacity (Profile 4). Positive spiritual coping strategies demonstrated progressively increasing mean scores, which were statistically significant from Profile 1 to 4. In negative spiritual coping strategies, the mean scores decreased progressively from Profile 1 to 3, with each decrease being statistically significant. Female students were likelier in Profiles 1 (β = -1.01, p < 0.05), 2 (β = -1.02, p < 0.001), and 3 (β = -0.73, p < 0.01) compared to Profile 4; Students with leadership experience were more often found in Profiles 3 (β = 0.66, p < 0.001) and 4 (β = 0.74, p < 0.01) compared to Profile 2, and students who live in urban areas were more likely to belong to Profile 4 than Profile 1 (β = 0.77, p < 0.05).</p><p><b>Conclusion</b><br>There was notable individual heterogeneity in resilience among students, with distinct differences in the use of spiritual coping strategies across these profiles. Future educational interventions promoting positive spiritual coping strategies could consider resilience as a core element. The primary focus of future resilience research and education should be on female students living in rural areas and students without leadership experience during college.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6955
dc.identifier.olddbid212853
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195871
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53796
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03510-1
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216248
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBatool, Shumaila
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber835
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12912-025-03510-1
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Nursing
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume24
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195871
dc.titleFactors influencing resilience and its relationship with spiritual coping strategies among nursing college students: a latent profile analysis
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12912-025-03510-1.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format