Can the use of landmarks improve the suitability of fluctuating asymmetry in plant leaves as an indicator of stress?

dc.contributor.authorSandner TM
dc.contributor.authorZverev V
dc.contributor.authorKozlov MV
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id40241040
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/40241040
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T11:59:24Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T11:59:24Z
dc.description.abstractFluctuating asymmetry (FA), defined as the random deviations from symmetry in morphological traits, has repeatedly been suggested as a handy indicator of genetic and environmental stress experienced by organisms during their development. However, the value of FA for applied ecological and environmental research is now questioned by a growing number of studies that have found no increases in FA under stress. We used geometric morphometrics to test the hypothesis that FA measures based on naturally defined landmarks are better suited for detection of deviations from leaf symmetry than are traditional measures of FA. We compared two sets of mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii) leaves, obtained from trees growing in industrially polluted natural populations and from experimentally stressed seedlings, by examining three measures of FA: 1) a traditional distance-based measure calculated from the width of the left and right halves of a leaf at the middle of the lamina (FA(width)), 2) a distance-based measure reflecting differences in vein length calculated from three landmarks (FA(veins)), and 3) a multivariate FA measure describing asymmetry in leaf shape based on five landmarks (FA(shapc)). These three FA measures were poorly (albeit positively) correlated with each other. The two distance-based measures reflected different parts of the multivariate measure FA(shape )which had the highest sensitivity for detection of deviations from leaf symmetry. FA(shape) was also the only FA measure that weakly confirmed the expected increase in FA under experimental stress, and particularly under stress caused by application of heavy metals. However, very high levels of within-individual variation in asymmetry remain to be explained, and even FA(shape )did not show the expected effects of.industrial pollution on leaf symmetry. We conclude that FA in birch leaves cannot be regarded as a reliable indicator of environmental stress, even when quantified using modern methods.
dc.format.pagerange457
dc.format.pagerange465
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7034
dc.identifier.jour-issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.olddbid173340
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/156434
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/31301
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042821626
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorZverev, Vitali
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKozlov, Mikhail
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.038
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEcological Indicators
dc.relation.volume97
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/156434
dc.titleCan the use of landmarks improve the suitability of fluctuating asymmetry in plant leaves as an indicator of stress?
dc.year.issued2019

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Sandner-etal-final-100818.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format