Is There Still a Role for the Second Chamber? An Italian Perspective

dc.contributor.authorLa Placa, Ferdinando
dc.contributor.organizationfi=oikeustiede|en=Laws|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.53046050752
dc.converis.publication-id491377850
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/491377850
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:19:09Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:19:09Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The paper wants to gauge the current relevance of the bicameral systems, focusing, primarily, on the rationales that traditionally brought to the adoption of the bicameral model and, then, specifically, on the Italian case. It will so first try to retrace the debate and the historical reasons that justified the emergence of bicameralism, showing how its purposes (representation, ponderation and safeguard) evolved and adapted in the contemporary constitutional systems. Therefore, referring to the Italian system, it will seek to analyse the constituent discussion and the evolution of the Italian bicameral model. Finally, considering its current state and the recent proposal of the ruling right-wing coalition to introduce the direct election of the Prime Minister, the paper will attempt to evaluate if the Italian bicameral system is still consistent with its rationales, if it should be reformed or if it should be abandoned in favour of a unicameral model.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange39
dc.format.pagerange66
dc.identifier.eissn2666-8912
dc.identifier.jour-issn2666-8904
dc.identifier.olddbid208909
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/191936
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/36002
dc.identifier.urlhttps://brill.com/view/journals/parl/5/1/article-p39_003.xml
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082792179
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLa Placa, Ferdinando
dc.okm.discipline513 Lawen_GB
dc.okm.discipline513 Oikeustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBrill
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1163/26668912-bja10103
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational journal of parliamentary studies
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume5
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/191936
dc.titleIs There Still a Role for the Second Chamber? An Italian Perspective
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
LaPlaca2025IsThereStillARoleForTheSecondChamber.pdf
Size:
621.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format