An immunohistochemistry-based classification of colorectal cancer resembling the consensus molecular subtypes using convolutional neural networks

dc.contributor.authorKaprio, Tuomas
dc.contributor.authorHagström, Jaana
dc.contributor.authorKasurinen, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorGkekas, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorEdin, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorBeilmann-Lehtonen, Ines
dc.contributor.authorStrigard, Karin
dc.contributor.authorPalmqvist, Richard
dc.contributor.authorGunnarson, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorBöckelman, Camilla
dc.contributor.authorHaglund, Caj
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id499008841
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/499008841
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:51:34Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:51:34Z
dc.description.abstractColorectal cancer (CRC) represents a major global disease burden with nearly 1 million cancer-related deaths annually. TNM staging has served as the foundation for predicting patient prognosis, despite variation across staging groups. The consensus molecular subtype (CMS) is a transcriptome-based system classifying CRC tumors into four subtypes with different characteristics: CMS1 (immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal). Transcriptomics is too complex and expensive for clinical implementation; therefore, an immunohistochemical method is needed. The prognostic impact of the immunohistochemistry-based four CMS-like subtypes remains unclear. Due to the complexity and costs associated with transcriptomics, we developed an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based method supported by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to define subgroups that resemble CMS biological characteristics. Building on previous IHC-classifiers and incorporating beta-catenin to refine differentiation between CMS2- and CMS3-like profiles, we categorized CRC tumors in a cohort of 538 patients. Classification was successful in 89.4% and 15.9% of tumors were classified as CMS1-like, 35.1% as CMS2-like, 38.7% as CMS3-like, and 11.7% as CMS4-like. CMS2-like patients exhibited the best overall survival (p = 0.018), including when local and metastasized disease were analyzed separately. Our method offers an accessible and clinically feasible CMS-inspired classification, although it does not serve as a replacement for transcriptomic CMS classification.
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322
dc.identifier.jour-issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.olddbid202941
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/185968
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/47513
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03618-z
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082785907
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHagström, Jaana
dc.okm.discipline3122 Cancersen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3122 Syöpätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.publisher.countryGermanyen_GB
dc.publisher.countrySaksafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeDE
dc.publisher.placeBERLIN
dc.relation.articlenumber19105
dc.relation.doi10.1038/s41598-025-03618-z
dc.relation.ispartofjournalScientific Reports
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/185968
dc.titleAn immunohistochemistry-based classification of colorectal cancer resembling the consensus molecular subtypes using convolutional neural networks
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s41598-025-03618-z.pdf
Size:
1.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format