Children’s physical custody arrangements and mothers’ employment in 11 European countries

dc.contributor.authorSalin, Milla
dc.contributor.authorHakovirta, Mia
dc.contributor.authorLindroos, Eija
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=INVEST tutkimuskeskus ja lippulaiva|en=INVEST Research Flagship Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sosiaalipolitiikka|en=Social Policy|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sosiologia|en=Sociology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.11531668876
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.45485937705
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.97542429515
dc.converis.publication-id500233853
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/500233853
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:47:14Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:47:14Z
dc.description.abstractAs joint physical custody (JPC) of children after parental separation has become more prevalent across countries, we need to know more about its impacts. This study examines whether JPC is associated with mother's paid employment given that childcare responsibilities are redistributed more equally between parents compared to mothers with sole physical custody (SPC). We provide the first comparative analysis on the relationship between a child's physical custody arrangement type and mother's employment across 11 European countries. Data are from the 2021 European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions Survey (EU-SILC). Our sample includes 3,846 mothers. We employ descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression analysis and decomposition analysis. Results reveal an employment gap between mothers with JPC and SPC: mothers with JPC are more likely to be employed than mothers with SPC, even when controlling for individual-level confounding factors and country context. Moreover, results show that only around half the employment gap between JPC mothers and SPC mothers can be explained by differences in characteristics and country context. Thus, we argue that JPC is likely to have an independent role on mothers' employment, and JPC eases the constraints of mother's paid work opportunities.
dc.identifier.eissn1469-3615
dc.identifier.jour-issn1366-8803
dc.identifier.olddbid212986
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196004
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54408
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2025.2549036
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216413
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSalin, Milla
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHakovirta, Mia
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLindroos, Eija
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1080/13668803.2025.2549036
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCommunity, Work and Family
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196004
dc.titleChildren’s physical custody arrangements and mothers’ employment in 11 European countries
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Children s physical custody arrangements and mothers employment in 11 European countries.pdf
Size:
862.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format