Baldwin versus Cecchini revisited: the growth impact of the European Single Market
| dc.contributor.author | Lehtimäki Jonne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sondermann David | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=taloustiede|en=Economics| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.17691981389 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 68321565 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/68321565 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-28T00:02:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-28T00:02:06Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | The European Single Market created a common market for millions of Europeans. However, 30 years after its introduction, it appears that the benefits of the common European project are occasionally being questioned at least by some parts of the population. Others, by contrast, strive for deeper integration. Against this background, we empirically gauge the growth effect that arose from the Single Market. Using the synthetic control method, we establish the growth premium for the Single Market overall and for its founding members. Broadly in line with the predictions made by Richard Baldwin at the onset of the Single Market project, we find significantly higher real GDP per capita for the overall Single Market area of around 12-22 %. In comparison, smaller EU Member States seem to have benefited somewhat more compared to larger countries. The estimated growth effects underline the case for further deepening and broadening the Single Market where possible. | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 603 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 635 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1435-8921 | |
| dc.identifier.jour-issn | 0377-7332 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 205059 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/188086 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53799 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00181-021-02161-w | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2022012710525 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Lehtimäki, Jonne | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 111 Mathematics | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 511 Economics | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 520 Other social sciences | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 111 Matematiikka | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.discipline | 511 Kansantaloustiede | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.discipline | 520 Muut yhteiskuntatieteet | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A1 ScientificArticle | |
| dc.publisher | Physica-Verl. | |
| dc.publisher.country | Germany | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Saksa | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | DE | |
| dc.relation.doi | 10.1007/s00181-021-02161-w | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Empirical Economics | |
| dc.relation.issue | 2 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 63 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188086 | |
| dc.title | Baldwin versus Cecchini revisited: the growth impact of the European Single Market | |
| dc.year.issued | 2022 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
- Name:
- LehtimäkiEtSondermann2021BaldwinVersusCecchiniRevisited.pdf
- Size:
- 2.26 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Publisher's pdf