Fluency across modes: an exploratory study of L1 and L2 spoken and written fluency

dc.contributor.authorMutta, Maarit
dc.contributor.authorPeltonen, Pauliina
dc.contributor.authorLaine, Päivi
dc.contributor.authorLintunen, Pekka
dc.contributor.organizationfi=digitaalinen kielentutkimus, espanja, italia, kiina, ranska, saksa|en=Digital Language Studies, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Spanish|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=englannin kieli, klassilliset kielet ja monikielinen käännösviestintä|en=English, Classics and Multilingual Translation Studies|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kotimaiset kielet ja niiden sukukielet|en=Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian languages|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36764574459
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.22758552511
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.59108485091
dc.converis.publication-id477588930
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/477588930
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-20T20:11:45Z
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>The article presents an exploratory cross-modal analysis of fluency profiles in spoken and written first (L1, Finnish) and second (L2, English) language production of the same language users. Our data come from two research projects, from which we identified 11 university students participating in both. The spoken tasks consisted of monologue picture description (analysed with Praat), and the written tasks were short argumentative essays (collected and analysed with keystroke logging software GGXLog). Based on commonly used measures to capture different aspects of spoken and written fluency, we used a set of 14 measures (seven for speech fluency, seven for writing fluency) to examine fluency across modes comprehensively. Four profiles were identified from the data: (1) fast and productive, (2) fast, (3) slow and productive, and (4) slow and reflective. Six speakers had the same profile in the L1 and L2, and seven writers had the same profile in the L1 and L2. Only one participant had the same profile in the L1 and L2 speaking and writing. The results suggest that the cross-modal differences are greater than the differences between languages. The modalities are inherently different, which is also reflected in individual variation between the modalities.</span> <br></p>
dc.format.pagerange172
dc.format.pagerange143
dc.identifier.eissn1613-4141
dc.identifier.jour-issn0019-042X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/60959
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0187
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2026052050825
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMutta, Maarit
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPeltonen, Pauliina
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaine, Päivi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLintunen, Pekka
dc.okm.discipline6121 Languagesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline6121 Kielitieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH
dc.publisher.countryGermanyen_GB
dc.publisher.countrySaksafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeDE
dc.relation.doi10.1515/iral-2024-0187
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume64
dc.titleFluency across modes: an exploratory study of L1 and L2 spoken and written fluency
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Fluency across modes_ An exploratory study_revised version_final_accepted for publication.pdf
Size:
641.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format