COVID-19 infection and later risk of sickness absence by socioeconomic status: a cohort study

dc.contributor.authorJoensuu, Matti
dc.contributor.authorKausto, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorAiraksinen, Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorOksanen, Tuula
dc.contributor.authorVahtera, Jussi
dc.contributor.authorKivimäki, Mika
dc.contributor.authorErvasti, Jenni
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kansanterveystiede|en=Public Health|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=väestötutkimuskeskus|en=Centre for Population Health Research (POP Centre)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.94792640685
dc.contributor.organization-code2607008
dc.converis.publication-id478088972
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/478088972
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T21:28:43Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T21:28:43Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Background The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant health risk and resulted in increased sickness absence during the pandemic. This study examines whether a history of COVID-19 infection is associated with a higher risk of subsequent sickness absence. <br></p><p>Methods In this prospective cohort study, 32,124 public sector employees responded to a survey on COVID-19 infection and lifestyle factors in 2020 and were linked to sickness absence records before (2019) and after (2021-2022) the survey. Study outcome was annual sickness absence defined as the total number of sickness absence days and the number of short sickness absence spells (< 10 days) and long sickness absence spells (10-365 days). We used negative binomial regression adjusting for sex, age, employment characteristics, body mass index, health behaviors in 2020 and sickness absence in 2019. We examined differences in sickness absence between socioeconomic statuses (SES), measured by occupational titles from employers' records. <br></p><p>Results A self-reported COVID-19 infection in 2020 was associated with higher subsequent risk of sickness absence in 2021: Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) compared to those not reporting COVID-19 was 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.37 for sickness absence days, 1.29, 1.20-1.38 for short sickness absence spells and 1.20, 1.04-1.37 for long spells. The association was strongest in employees with intermediate SES: 1.45, 1.20-1.77 days, 1.42, 1.26-1.61 short spells, and 1.30, 1.03-1.64 long spells. For employees with low and high SES, an association was observed only for short spells. <br></p><p>Conclusions Employees who reported contracting first-wave COVID-19 infection had higher rates of sickness absence in the following year. This excess risk was most consistently observed in employees with intermediate socioeconomic status (e.g. office workers, registered nurses, and social workers).</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458
dc.identifier.jour-issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.olddbid200467
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/183494
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/46631
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21148-7
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789116
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVahtera, Jussi
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBMC
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.publisher.placeLONDON
dc.relation.articlenumber3622
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12889-024-21148-7
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Public Health
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume24
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/183494
dc.titleCOVID-19 infection and later risk of sickness absence by socioeconomic status: a cohort study
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s12889-024-21148-7.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format