Experimental Evidence Questions the Relationship between Stress and Fluctuating Asymmetry in Plants

dc.contributor.authorGavrikov Dmitry E.
dc.contributor.authorZverev Vitali
dc.contributor.authorRachenko Maksim A.
dc.contributor.authorPristavka Aleksey A.
dc.contributor.authorKozlov Mikhail
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id179127367
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/179127367
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:50:04Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:50:04Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The eco-evolutionary theory of developmental instability predicts that small, non-directional deviations from perfect symmetry in morphological traits (termed fluctuating asymmetry, FA) emerge when an individual is unable to buffer environmental or genetic stress during its development. Consequently, FA is widely used as an index of stress. The goal of the present study was to experimentally test a seemingly trivial prediction derived from the theory of developmental instability—and from previous observational studies—that significant growth retardation (which indicates stress) in plants is accompanied by an increase in FA of their leaves. We induced stress, evidenced by a significant decrease in biomass relative to control, in cucumber (Cucumis sativus), sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) by applying water solutions of copper and nickel to the soil in which plants were grown. Repeated blind measurements of plant leaves revealed that leaf FA did not differ between stressed and control plants. This finding, once again, demonstrated that FA cannot be seen as a universal indicator of environmental stress. We recommend that the use of FA as a stress index is discontinued until the scope of the developmental instability theory is clarified and its applicability limits are identified.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2073-8994
dc.identifier.jour-issn2073-8994
dc.identifier.olddbid202893
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/185920
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/50536
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020339
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023040535101
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorZverev, Vitali
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKozlov, Mikhail
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumber339
dc.relation.doi10.3390/sym15020339
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSymmetry
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume15
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/185920
dc.titleExperimental Evidence Questions the Relationship between Stress and Fluctuating Asymmetry in Plants
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
symmetry-15-00339-v2.pdf
Size:
986.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format