Machine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries

dc.contributor.authorJuhola Martti
dc.contributor.authorNikkanen Tommi
dc.contributor.authorNiemi Juho
dc.contributor.authorWelling Maiju
dc.contributor.authorKampman Olli
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.16217176722
dc.converis.publication-id180692581
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/180692581
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T21:59:11Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T21:59:11Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Adverse events are common in health care. In psychiatric treatment, compensation claims for patient injuries appear to be less common than in other medical specialties. The most common types of patient injury claims in psychiatry include diagnostic flaws, unprevented suicide, or coercive treatment deemed as unnecessary or harmful.<br></p><p>Objectives: The objective was to study whether it is possible to form different categories of patient injury types associated with the psychiatric evaluations of compensation claims and to base machine learning classification on these categories. Further, the binary classification of positive and negative decisions for compensation claims was the other objective.<br></p><p>Methods: Finnish psychiatric specialist evaluations for the compensation claims of patient injuries were classified into six different categories called classes applying the machine learning methods of artificial intelligence. In addition, another classification of the same data into two classes was performed to test whether it was possible to classify data cases according to their known decisions, either accepted or declined compensation claim.<br></p><p>Results: The former classification task produced relatively good classification results subject to separating between different classes. Instead, the latter was more complex. However, classification accuracies of both tasks could be improved by using the generation of artificial data cases in the preprocessing phase before classifications. This preprocessing improved the classification accuracy of six classes up to 88% when the method of random forests was used for classification and that of the binary classification to 89%.<br></p><p>Conclusion: The results show that the objectives defined were possible to solve reasonably.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn0026-1270
dc.identifier.jour-issn0026-1270
dc.identifier.olddbid201540
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/184567
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/48444
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055%2Fs-0043-1771378
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789483
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKampman, Olli
dc.okm.discipline113 Computer and information sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurology and psychiatryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3141 Health care scienceen_GB
dc.okm.discipline113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurologia ja psykiatriafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3141 Terveystiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherGEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
dc.publisher.countryGermanyen_GB
dc.publisher.countrySaksafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeDE
dc.relation.doi10.1055/s-0043-1771378
dc.relation.ispartofjournalMethods of Information in Medicine
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/184567
dc.titleMachine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s-0043-1771378.pdf
Size:
503.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format