Immediate repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite after saliva or water contamination

dc.contributor.authorBijelic-Donova Jasmina
dc.contributor.authorFlett Andrew
dc.contributor.authorLassila Lippo V.J.
dc.contributor.authorVallittu Pekka K.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hammaslääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Dentistry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.64787032594
dc.converis.publication-id35684876
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/35684876
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T11:44:32Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T11:44:32Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of particulate filler composite (PFC) to saliva- or water-contaminated fiber-reinforced composite (FRC).<br />Materials and Methods: One type of FRC substrate with semi-interpenetrating polymer matrix (semi-IPN) (everStick C&B) was used in this investigation. A microhybrid PFC (Filtek Z250) substrate served as control. Freshly cured PFC and FRC substrates were first subjected to different contamination and surface cleaning treatments, then the microhybrid PFC restorative material (Filtek Z250) was built up on the substrates in 2-mm increments and light cured. Uncontaminated and saliva- or water-contaminated substrate surfaces were either left untreated or were cleaned via phosphoric acid etching or water spray accompanied with or without adhesive composite application prior applying the adherent PFC material. SBS was evaluated after thermocycling the specimens (6000 cycles, 5°C and 55°C). <br />Results: Three-way ANOVA showed that both the surface contamination and the surface treatment signficantly affected the bond strength (p < 0.05). Saliva contamination reduced the SBS more than did the water contamination. SBS loss after saliva contamination was 73.7% and 31.3% for PFC and FRC, respectively. After water contamination, SBS loss was 17.2% and 13.3% for PFC and FRC, respectively. The type of surface treatment was significant for PFC (p < 0.05), but not for FRC (p = 0.572). <br />Conclusion: Upon contamination of freshly cured PFC or semi-IPN FRC, surfaces should be re-prepared via phosphoric acid etching, water cleaning, drying, and application of adhesive composite in order to recover optimal bond strength.<br /> </p>
dc.format.pagerange205
dc.format.pagerange212
dc.identifier.eissn1757-9988
dc.identifier.jour-issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.olddbid171819
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/154913
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/29440
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719655
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBijelic-Donova, Jasmina
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLassila, Lippo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVallittu, Pekka
dc.okm.discipline313 Dentistryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline313 Hammaslääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co., Ltd
dc.relation.doi10.3290/j.jad.a40515
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume20
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/154913
dc.titleImmediate repair bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite after saliva or water contamination
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
JBD-FRC Saliva contamination.pdf
Size:
206.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version