Action after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review

dc.contributor.authorLiukka Mari
dc.contributor.authorSteven Alison
dc.contributor.authorMoreno M Flores Vizcaya
dc.contributor.authorSara-aho Arja
dc.contributor.authorKhakurel Jayden
dc.contributor.authorPearson Pauline
dc.contributor.authorTurunen Hannele
dc.contributor.authorTella Susanna
dc.contributor.organizationfi=INVEST tutkimuskeskus ja lippulaiva|en=INVEST Research Flagship Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=lastenpsykiatrian tutkimuskeskus|en=Research Centre for Child Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.11531668876
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.83706093164
dc.converis.publication-id47905340
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/47905340
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:34:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:34:05Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Adverse events are common in healthcare. Three types of victims of patient-related adverse events can be identified. The first type includes patients and their families, the second type includes healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event and the third type includes healthcare organisations in which an adverse event occurs. The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesise knowledge, theory and evidence regarding action after adverse events, based on literature published in the last ten years (2009–2018). In the studies critically evaluated (n = 25), key themes emerged relating to the first, second and third victim elements. The first victim elements comprise attention to revealing an adverse event, communication after an event, first victim support and complete apology. The second victim elements include second victim support types and services, coping strategies, professional changes after adverse events and learning about adverse event phenomena. The third victim elements consist of organisational action after adverse events, strategy, infrastructure and training and open communication about adverse events. There is a lack of comprehensive models for action after adverse events. This requires understanding of the phenomenon along with ambition to manage adverse events as a whole. When an adverse event is identified and a concern expressed, systematic damage preventing and ameliorating actions should be immediately launched. System-wide development is needed.<br /></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601
dc.identifier.jour-issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.olddbid189017
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/172111
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/43989
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134717
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042827098
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKhakurel, Jayden
dc.okm.discipline3141 Health care scienceen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3141 Terveystiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumber4717
dc.relation.doi10.3390/ijerph17134717
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.relation.issue13
dc.relation.volume17
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/172111
dc.titleAction after Adverse Events in Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
ijerph-17-04717.pdf
Size:
364.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version