How Big Is It Really? Assessing the Efficacy of Indirect Estimates of Body Size in Asian Elephants

dc.contributor.authorChapman SN
dc.contributor.authorMumby HS
dc.contributor.authorCrawley JAH
dc.contributor.authorMar KU
dc.contributor.authorHtut W
dc.contributor.authorSoe AT
dc.contributor.authorAung HH
dc.contributor.authorLummaa V
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id2577930
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/2577930
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:44:20Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:44:20Z
dc.description.abstract<p> Information on an organism's body size is pivotal in understanding its life history and fitness, as well as helping inform conservation measures. However, for many species, particularly large-bodied wild animals, taking accurate body size measurements can be a challenge. Various means to estimate body size have been employed, from more direct methods such as using photogrammetry to obtain height or length measurements, to indirect prediction of weight using other body morphometrics or even the size of dung boli. It is often unclear how accurate these measures are because they cannot be compared to objective measures. Here, we investigate how well existing estimation equations predict the actual body weight of Asian elephants Elephas maximus, using body measurements (height, chest girth, length, foot circumference and neck circumference) taken directly from a large population of semi-captive animals in Myanmar (n = 404). We then define new and better fitting formulas to predict body weight in Myanmar elephants from these readily available measures. We also investigate whether the important parameters height and chest girth can be estimated from photographs (n = 151). Our results show considerable variation in the ability of existing estimation equations to predict weight, and that the equations proposed in this paper predict weight better in almost all circumstances. We also find that measurements from standardised photographs reflect body height and chest girth after applying minor adjustments. Our results have implications for size estimation of large wild animals in the field, as well as for management in captive settings.</p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.olddbid183992
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/167086
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/44850
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150533
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042714704
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLummaa, Virpi
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN e0150533
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0150533
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume11
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/167086
dc.titleHow Big Is It Really? Assessing the Efficacy of Indirect Estimates of Body Size in Asian Elephants
dc.year.issued2016

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
asset.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format