Nurses', patients', and informal caregivers' attitudes toward aggression in psychiatric hospitals: A comparative survey study

dc.contributor.authorVälimäki Maritta
dc.contributor.authorLam Joyce
dc.contributor.authorBressington Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCheung Teris
dc.contributor.authorWong Wai Kit
dc.contributor.authorCheng Po Yee Ivy
dc.contributor.authorNg Chi Fai
dc.contributor.authorNg Tony
dc.contributor.authorYam Chun Pong
dc.contributor.authorIp Glendy
dc.contributor.authorPaul Lee
dc.contributor.authorLantta Tella
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.converis.publication-id178614639
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/178614639
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:57:04Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:57:04Z
dc.description.abstractAttitudes toward aggression is a controversial phenomenon in psychiatry. This study examined and compared attitudes toward patient aggression in psychiatric hospitals from the perspectives of nurses, patients and informal caregivers and identified factors associated to these attitudes. A total of 2,424 participants completed a self-reported instrument regarding attitudes toward aggression (12-items Perception of Aggression Scale; POAS-S). We analysed data from nurses (n = 782), patients (n = 886), and informal caregivers (n = 765). Pearson's rcorrelations were used to examine associations between variables. Differences between group scores were analysed using ANOVA/MANOVA with post-hoc Sheffe tests. Multivariate logistic regression models and logistic regression analysis were used to examine the effects of respondents' characteristics on their attitudes toward aggression. Nurses had significantly more negative and less tolerant perceptions toward aggression (mean [SD] 47.1 [7.5], p<0.001) than the patients (mean [SD] 44.4 [8.2]) and the informal caregivers (mean [SD] 45.0 [6.9), according to the POAS-S total scores. The same trend was found with the dysfunction and function sub-scores (mean [SD] 25.3 [4.1] and 15.0 [3.6], respectively); the differences between the groups were statistically significant (p <0.001) when nurses' scores were compared to those of both the patients (mean [SD] 23.7 [5.3] and 14.0 [4.1], respectively) and the informal caregivers (mean [SD] 24.4 [4.2] and 13.9 [3.5], respectively). The study offers new understanding of aggressive behavior in different treatment settings where attitudes toward patient behavior raises ethical and practical dilemmas. These results indicate a need for more targeted on-the-job training for nursing staff, aggression management rehabilitation programs for patients, and peer-support programs for informal caregivers focused on patient aggression.
dc.format.pagerange1
dc.format.pagerange18
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.jour-issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.olddbid204924
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187951
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53634
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274536
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023021827708
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVälimäki, Maritta
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLam, Yuen Ting Joyce
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLantta, Tella
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPublic Library Science
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumbere0274536
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0274536
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issue9
dc.relation.volume17
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187951
dc.titleNurses', patients', and informal caregivers' attitudes toward aggression in psychiatric hospitals: A comparative survey study
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
journal.pone.0274536 (1).pdf
Size:
490.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format