Geographical variation in treated psychotic and other mental disorders in Finland by region and urbanicity

dc.contributor.authorSuokas Kimmo
dc.contributor.authorKurkela Olli
dc.contributor.authorNevalainen Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorSuvisaari Jaana
dc.contributor.authorHakulinen Christian
dc.contributor.authorKampman Olli
dc.contributor.authorPirkola Sami
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.16217176722
dc.converis.publication-id180012280
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/180012280
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:50:57Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:50:57Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose<br>In Finland, prevalence of schizophrenia is higher in the eastern and northern regions and co-occurs with the distribution of schizophrenia polygenic risk scores. Both genetic and environmental factors have been hypothesized to contribute to this variation. We aimed to examine the prevalence of psychotic and other mental disorders by region and degree of urbanicity, and the impacts of socio-economic adjustments on these associations.<br></p><p>Methods<br>Nationwide population registers from 2011 to 2017 and healthcare registers from 1975 to 2017. We used 19 administrative and three aggregate regions based on the distribution of schizophrenia polygenic risk scores, and a seven-level urban-rural classification. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated by Poisson regression models and adjusted for gender, age, and calendar year (basic adjustments), and Finnish origin, residential history, urbanicity, household income, economic activity, and physical comorbidity (additional adjustments) on an individual level. Average marginal effects were used to visualize interaction effects between region and urbanicity.<br></p><p>Results<br>A total of 5,898,180 individuals were observed. All mental disorders were slightly more prevalent (PR 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02-1.03]), and psychotic disorders (1.11 [1.10-1.12]) and schizophrenia (1.19 [1.17-1.21]) considerably more prevalent in eastern and northern than in western coastal regions. After the additional adjustments, however, the PRs were 0.95 (0.95-0.96), 1.00 (0.99-1.01), and 1.03 (1.02-1.04), respectively. Urban residence was associated with increased prevalence of psychotic disorders across all regions (adjusted PR 1.21 [1.20-1.22]).<br></p><p>Conclusion<br>After adjusting for socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors, the within-country distribution of mental disorders no longer followed the traditional east-west gradient. Urban-rural differences, on the other hand, persisted after the adjustments.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1433-9285
dc.identifier.jour-issn0933-7954
dc.identifier.olddbid208158
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/191185
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/57550
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-023-02516-x
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082787895
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKampman, Olli
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurology and psychiatryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurologia ja psykiatriafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.publisher.countryGermanyen_GB
dc.publisher.countrySaksafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeDE
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s00127-023-02516-x
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/191185
dc.titleGeographical variation in treated psychotic and other mental disorders in Finland by region and urbanicity
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s00127-023-02516-x.pdf
Size:
2.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format