Challenging the value of a pseudoreplicated study: A comment to Liu et al. (2024)

dc.contributor.authorKozlov, Mikhail V.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id458221217
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/458221217
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:48:56Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:48:56Z
dc.description.abstractThe paper by Liu et al. (2024) presents measurements of herbivory and six plant traits considered potential antiherbivore defences in seven plant species across two study plots: one mined and one adjacent unmined plot. I argue that this experimental design is inadequate for testing the authors' hypothesis that differences in herbivory and plant traits between these two plots are due to pollution impact, as the study lacks replication of pollution levels. This issue, which could have been easily addressed when designing the study, reflects insufficient attention to experimental design and seriously compromises the validity of the research findings. I briefly reiterate what pseudoreplication is and which fundamental principle of statistical inference it violates. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of SAAB. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
dc.format.pagerange180
dc.format.pagerange182
dc.identifier.eissn1727-9321
dc.identifier.jour-issn0254-6299
dc.identifier.olddbid209752
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/192779
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/49408
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.09.019
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082792481
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKozlov, Mikhail
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.publisher.placeAMSTERDAM
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.sajb.2024.09.019
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSouth African Journal of Botany
dc.relation.volume174
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/192779
dc.titleChallenging the value of a pseudoreplicated study: A comment to Liu et al. (2024)
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0254629924005751-main.pdf
Size:
320.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format