Retrieving past experiences to inform novel decisions through a process of cascading episodic sampling

dc.contributor.authorFenneman, Achiel
dc.contributor.authorMalamut, Sarah T.
dc.contributor.authorSanfey, Alan G.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=INVEST tutkimuskeskus ja lippulaiva|en=INVEST Research Flagship Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykologia|en=Psychology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.11531668876
dc.contributor.organization-code2603103
dc.converis.publication-id498978842
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/498978842
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:10:21Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:10:21Z
dc.description.abstractWe can guide our decisions in novel situations by drawing on our past experiences (episodic memories). While at times we can retrieve relevant episodes via cued recall, other situations may require a process of memory search. But what mechanisms underlie this search? In this work we synthesize six key principles concerning the storage and retrieval of episodic memories, and build on these principles to propose a cognitive mechanism which allows for the retrieval of relevant past experiences through a process of cascading recall. In this process, observing a stimulus triggers the cued recall of a past event. If this memory does not provide sufficient information to warrant a decision, then it next reinstates all the memory's constituent features. These features then form the inputs to sample an additional memory in a subsequent recall step, which in turn reinstates its own features and so forth. This process continues until a suitable past experience is retrieved. We provide empirical support for key predictions of this cascading process through three online experiments in which participants interacted with unfamiliar stimuli. The results indicate that participants rely on cued recall of similar past experiences (experiment 1), and on indirectly related experiences when cued recall is not informative (experiment 2). Additionally, participants were substantially more likely to retrieve a predicted memory, and did so faster, when relying on cued recall versus cascadizng memory search (experiment 3). We conclude by discussing how this cascading recall process bridges several influential models of memory-based decision-making, as well as offering promising directions for future research.
dc.identifier.eissn1095-5623
dc.identifier.jour-issn0010-0285
dc.identifier.olddbid208687
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/191714
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/58251
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2025.101744
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082792089
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMalamut, Sarah
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.publisher.placeSAN DIEGO
dc.relation.articlenumber101744
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.cogpsych.2025.101744
dc.relation.ispartofjournalCognitive Psychology
dc.relation.volume159
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/191714
dc.titleRetrieving past experiences to inform novel decisions through a process of cascading episodic sampling
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0010028525000325-main.pdf
Size:
12.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format