Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study
| dc.contributor.author | Thomas A. van Essen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hugo F. den Boogert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maryse C. Cnossen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Godard C. W. de Ruiter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Iain Haitsma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Suzanne Polinder | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ewout W. Steyerberg | |
| dc.contributor.author | David Menon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Andrew I. R. Maas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hester F. Lingsma | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilco C. Peul | |
| dc.contributor.author | CENTER-TBI Investigators and Participants | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=anestesiologia ja tehohoito|en=Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care| | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=kliiniset neurotieteet|en=Clinical Neurosciences| | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.74845969893 | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.82197219338 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 38871916 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/38871916 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-27T21:55:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-27T21:55:05Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <h4>BACKGROUND: </h4><p>Neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging, with only low-quality evidence. We aimed to explore differences in neurosurgical strategies for TBI across Europe.</p><h4>METHODS: </h4><p>A survey was sent to 68 centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The questionnaire contained 21 questions, including the decision when to operate (or not) on traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and when to perform a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in raised intracranial pressure (ICP).</p><h4>RESULTS: </h4><p>The survey was completed by 68 centers (100%). On average, 10 neurosurgeons work in each trauma center. In all centers, a neurosurgeon was available within 30 min. Forty percent of responders reported a thickness or volume threshold for evacuation of an ASDH. Most responders (78%) decide on a primary DC in evacuating an ASDH during the operation, when swelling is present. For ICH, 3% would perform an evacuation directly to prevent secondary deterioration and 66% only in case of clinical deterioration. Most respondents (91%) reported to consider a DC for refractory high ICP. The reported cut-off ICP for DC in refractory high ICP, however, differed: 60% uses 25 mmHg, 18% 30 mmHg, and 17% 20 mmHg. Treatment strategies varied substantially between regions, specifically for the threshold for ASDH surgery and DC for refractory raised ICP. Also within center variation was present: 31% reported variation within the hospital for inserting an ICP monitor and 43% for evacuating mass lesions.</p><h4>CONCLUSION: </h4><p>Despite a homogeneous organization, considerable practice variation exists of neurosurgical strategies for TBI in Europe. These results provide an incentive for comparative effectiveness research to determine elements of effective neurosurgical care.</p> | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 435 | |
| dc.format.pagerange | 449 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 0942-0940 | |
| dc.identifier.jour-issn | 0001-6268 | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 201404 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/184431 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/48230 | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824792 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Katila, Ari | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Posti, Jussi | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Takala, Riikka | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Tenovuo, Olli | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Dataimport, tyks, vsshp | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3124 Neurology and psychiatry | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiology | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3124 Neurologia ja psykiatria | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.discipline | 3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologia | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | International publication | |
| dc.okm.type | A1 ScientificArticle | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.publisher.country | Austria | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Itävalta | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | AT | |
| dc.relation.doi | 10.1007/s00701-018-3761-z | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Acta Neurochirurgica | |
| dc.relation.issue | 3 | |
| dc.relation.volume | 161 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/184431 | |
| dc.title | Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study | |
| dc.year.issued | 2019 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
- Name:
- Essen2018_Article_VariationInNeurosurgicalManage.pdf
- Size:
- 965.74 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Publisher's version