Does lung function predict the risk of disability pension? An 11-year register-based follow-up study

dc.contributor.authorIrmeli Lindström
dc.contributor.authorPaula Pallasaho
dc.contributor.authorJouko Remes
dc.contributor.authorTuula Vasankari
dc.contributor.authorMarkku Heliövaara
dc.contributor.organizationfi=keuhkosairausoppi ja kliininen allergologia|en=Pulmonary Diseases and Clinical Allergology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.92467408925
dc.converis.publication-id46457023
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/46457023
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:58:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:58:27Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background</strong> Spirometry is widely used in medical surveillance in occupational health and as a diagnostic test for obstructive and restrictive lung disease. We evaluated the effect of spirometry parameters on the risk of all-cause disability pension in a follow-up study of an occupationally active general population-based cohort. </p><p><strong>Methods</strong> We measured the pulmonary function of 3386 currently working participants of the Health 2000 Survey in the clinical phase at baseline using spirometry. We obtained the retirement events of the cohort from the nationwide register for 2000-2011. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine disability pensions. </p><p><strong>Results</strong> At baseline, we identified 111 (3.3%) participants with obstructive spirometry, 95 (2.8%) with restrictive spirometry, and 3180 controls without restriction or obstruction. The age, sex, educational level, body-mass index, co-morbidities (1 or >= 2), and the smoking-adjusted hazard ratio of disability pension was 1.07 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.64-1.78) for those with obstructive spirometry, and 1.44 (95% CI 0.89-2.32) for those with restrictive spirometry. As continuous variables, and divided into quartiles, the risk of the lowest quartile of forced ventilation capacity (FVC)% of predicted was 1.49 (95%CI 1.10-2.01) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)% of predicted 1.66 (95%CI: 1.23-2.24) in comparison to the highest quartile in the adjusted models. </p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Obstructive or restrictive spirometry did not predict disability pension when dichotomized classified variables (normal compared to abnormal) were used. As continuous variables and when divided into quartiles, lower lung volumes showed an increase in the risk of disability pension. Physicians should take this into account when they use spirometry as a prognostic factor of work disability.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2458
dc.identifier.jour-issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.olddbid185528
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/168622
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/42302
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042824505
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVasankari, Tuula
dc.okm.discipline3121 Internal medicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3121 Sisätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherBMC
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 165
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s12889-020-8277-9
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Public Health
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume20
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/168622
dc.titleDoes lung function predict the risk of disability pension? An 11-year register-based follow-up study
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
VasankariEtAl2020DoesLung.pdf
Size:
731.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's pdf