Development of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)

dc.contributor.authorLaakso Juha T.
dc.contributor.authorSilvola Juha
dc.contributor.authorHirvonen Timo
dc.contributor.authorSuutarla Samuli
dc.contributor.authorKivekäs Ilkka
dc.contributor.authorSaarinen Riitta
dc.contributor.authorHaavisto Lotta
dc.contributor.authorLaitakari Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorAarnisalo Antti A.
dc.contributor.authorDietz Aarno
dc.contributor.authorJero Jussi
dc.contributor.authorHytönen Maija
dc.contributor.authorSinkkonen Saku T.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=korva-, nenä-, ja kurkkutautioppi|en=Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.93326749889
dc.contributor.organization-code2607312
dc.converis.publication-id53325317
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/53325317
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T12:46:39Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T12:46:39Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Purpose</p><p>An important outcome measure of patient care is the impact on the patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Current ear-specific HRQoL instruments are designed for one diagnosis and emphasize different subdivisions such as symptoms, hearing problems, psychosocial impact, and the need for care. The optimal length of the recall period has not been studied. For these reasons, a new survey is needed that would cover most chronic ear diseases.<br /></p><p>Methods</p><p>A preliminary 24-item survey (EOS-24) was created. Untreated adult patients (included n = 186) with one of seven different chronic otologic conditions from all university hospitals in Finland were recruited to respond to EOS-24 and the 15D general HRQoL instrument. The recruiting otologists evaluated the severity of the disease and the disability caused by it. A control group was recruited. Based on the patients’ responses in different diagnosis groups, the items were reduced according to pre-defined criteria. The resulting survey was validated using a thorough statistical analysis.<br /></p><p>Results</p><p>The relevance and necessity of the original 24 items were thoroughly investigated, leading to the exclusion of 8 items and the modification of 1. The remaining 16 items were well-balanced between subdivisions and were useful in all seven diagnosis groups, thus constituting the final instrument, EOS-16. The most suitable recall period was three months.<br /></p><p>Conclusions</p><p>EOS-16 has been created according to the HRQoL survey guidelines with a versatile nationwide patient population. The survey has been validated and can be used for a wide range of chronic ear diseases as a HRQoL instrument.<br /></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2524-1753
dc.identifier.jour-issn1672-2930
dc.identifier.olddbid178889
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/161983
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/36485
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293021000039?via=ihub
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042825840
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHaavisto, Lotta
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorJero, Jussi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3125 Otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3125 Korva-, nenä- ja kurkkutaudit, silmätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
dc.publisher.countryChinaen_GB
dc.publisher.countryKiinafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCN
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.joto.2021.01.003
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Otology
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/161983
dc.titleDevelopment of otology specific outcome measure: Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16)
dc.year.issued2021

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S1672293021000039-main.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's PDF