Adult learning and social inequalities – Processes of equalisation or cumulative disadvantage?

dc.contributor.authorElina Kilpi-Jakonen
dc.contributor.authorDaniela Vono de Vilhena
dc.contributor.authorHans-Peter Blossfeld
dc.contributor.organizationfi=sosiologia|en=Sociology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.45485937705
dc.converis.publication-id2050214
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/2050214
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:56:42Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:56:42Z
dc.description.abstract<p> Adult learning is an increasingly important form of education in globalised and aging societies. While current policy recommendations tend to focus on increasing participation rates, the authos of this article argue that higher participation rates do not necessarily lead to lower social/educational inequalities in participation. The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between social inequalities and adult learning by exploring cross-national patterns of participation in different adult<br> learning activities and the consequences of participation on individual labour market trajectories. The empirical basis of the paper is an analysis of 13 country studies (as well as two cross-national analyses) brought together by the international comparative research project ‘‘Education as a lifelong process – comparing educational trajectories in modern societies’’ (eduLIFE). Despite wide variations in participation rates across countries, mechanisms of social/educational inequality in engagement in<br> job-related adult learning tend to be relatively similar across countries, in particular with regard to non-formal learning. Effects tend most frequently to be a presence of cumulative advantage, though in some countries a certain degree of equalisation is noticeable with regard to formal adult education. The authors conclude that it is relatively clear that currently almost no country is truly able to reduce social inequalities through adult learning. Their recommendation is that public policy makers should place greater emphasis on making adult learning more accessible (in terms of entry requirements, affordability as well as motivation) to underrepresented groups, in particular those who are educationally disadvantaged.</p>
dc.format.pagerange529
dc.format.pagerange546
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0638
dc.identifier.jour-issn0020-8566
dc.identifier.olddbid203081
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/186108
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/50697
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082789991
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKilpi-Jakonen, Elina
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sociologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline516 Educational sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline5141 Sosiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline516 Kasvatustieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11159-015-9498-5
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Review of Education
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume61
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/186108
dc.titleAdult learning and social inequalities – Processes of equalisation or cumulative disadvantage?
dc.year.issued2015

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Kilpi-Jakonen_et_al_2015_adult learning.pdf
Size:
107.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format