AG’s Opinion in Cases Mio and Konektra Clarifies Criteria for Assessing Copyright Infringement
| dc.contributor.author | Härkönen, Heidi | |
| dc.contributor.organization | fi=oikeustiede|en=Laws| | |
| dc.contributor.organization-code | 1.2.246.10.2458963.20.53046050752 | |
| dc.converis.publication-id | 500493220 | |
| dc.converis.url | https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/500493220 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-21T14:01:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-21T14:01:37Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>On 8 May 2025, Maciej Szpunar, Advocate General at the CJEU, delivered his Opinion in the joined cases Mio and Konektra. This article, written at the request of IPRinfo readers, analyses the key aspects of the Opinion.<br></p> | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1799-909X | |
| dc.identifier.jour-issn | 1799-909X | |
| dc.identifier.olddbid | 213352 | |
| dc.identifier.oldhandle | 10024/196370 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/55234 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://iprinfo.fi/artikkeli/ags-opinion-in-cases-mio-and-konektra-clarifies-criteria-for-assessing-copyright-infringement/ | |
| dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi-fe202601216345 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.okm.affiliatedauthor | Härkönen, Heidi | |
| dc.okm.discipline | 513 Law | en_GB |
| dc.okm.discipline | 513 Oikeustiede | fi_FI |
| dc.okm.internationalcopublication | not an international co-publication | |
| dc.okm.internationality | Domestic publication | |
| dc.okm.type | D1 Article | |
| dc.publisher | IPR University Center Association ry | |
| dc.publisher.country | Finland | en_GB |
| dc.publisher.country | Suomi | fi_FI |
| dc.publisher.country-code | FI | |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | IPRinfo | |
| dc.relation.issue | 3/2025 | |
| dc.source.identifier | https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196370 | |
| dc.title | AG’s Opinion in Cases Mio and Konektra Clarifies Criteria for Assessing Copyright Infringement | |
| dc.year.issued | 2025 |
Tiedostot
1 - 1 / 1