A methodological framework for theoretical explanation in performance management and management control systems research

dc.contributor.authorPfister Jan A.
dc.contributor.authorPeda Peeter
dc.contributor.authorOtley David
dc.contributor.organizationfi=laskentatoimen ja rahoituksen laitos|en=Department of Accounting and Finance|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.70648218033
dc.converis.publication-id69103169
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/69103169
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:16:20Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:16:20Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Purpose –</strong> The purpose of this paper is to reflect on how to apply the abductive research process for developing a theoretical explanation in studies on performance management and management control systems. This is important because theoretically ambitious research tends to require explanatory study outcomes, but prior research frameworks provide little guidance in this regard, potentially facilitating ill-defined research designs and a lack of common vocabulary and criteria for evaluating studies.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach</strong> – The authors introduce a methodological framework that distinguishes three interwoven theoretical abstraction levels: descriptive, analytical, and explanatory. They use a recently published qualitative field study to illustrate an application of the framework.</p><p><strong>Findings – </strong>The framework and its illustrated application make the systematic logic of the abductive research process visible and accessible to researchers. The authors explain how the framework supports moving from empirical description to theoretical explanation during the research process and where the three levels might open spaces for the positioning of novel practices and conceptual and theoretical innovations.</p><p><strong>Originality/value – </strong>The framework provides guidance for an explanatory research design and theory-building purpose and has been developed in response to recent criticism in the field that highlights the wide gap between leading-edge practice and the lagging state of theory. It offers interdisciplinary vocabulary and evaluation criteria that can be applied by any accounting and management researcher regardless of whether they pursue critical, interpretive, or positivist research and whether they primarily employ qualitative or quantitative research methods.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Theorizing; Methodology; Research process; Abduction; Performance management; Management control systems<br></p>
dc.identifier.jour-issn1176-6093
dc.identifier.olddbid187297
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/170391
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/38644
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QRAM-10-2021-0193/full/html
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2022081154914
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorPfister, Jan
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1108/QRAM-10-2021-0193
dc.relation.ispartofjournalQualitative Research in Accounting and Management
dc.relation.issue2
dc.relation.volume20
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/170391
dc.titleA methodological framework for theoretical explanation in performance management and management control systems research
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Pfister Peda & Otley (2022) - QRAM - PM and MCS framework.pdf
Size:
484.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format