A Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data

dc.contributor.authorOtto Waris
dc.contributor.authorAnna Soveri
dc.contributor.authorMiikka Ahti
dc.contributor.authorRussell C. Hoffing
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Ventus
dc.contributor.authorSusanne M. Jaeggi
dc.contributor.authorAaron R. Seitz
dc.contributor.authorMatti Laine
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.16217176722
dc.converis.publication-id26968176
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/26968176
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-25T16:08:41Z
dc.date.available2022-02-25T16:08:41Z
dc.description.abstractWorking memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and n-back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults (n = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except n-back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The n-back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the n-back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses.
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078
dc.identifier.olddbid170179
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/153289
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/29268
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042717278
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSoveri, Anna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorAhti, Miikka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaine, Matti
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 1062
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.relation.volume8
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/153289
dc.titleA Latent Factor Analysis of Working Memory Measures Using Large-Scale Data
dc.year.issued2017

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
fpsyg-08-01062.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version