Systems of random variables and the free will theorem

dc.contributor.authorEhtibar N. Dzhafarov
dc.contributor.authorJanne V. Kujala
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tilastotiede|en=Statistics|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.42133013740
dc.converis.publication-id52149257
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/52149257
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:29:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:29:15Z
dc.description.abstractThe title refers to the free will theorem by Conway and Kochen whose flashy formulation is as follows: If experimenters possess free will, then so do particles. In more modest terms, the theorem says that individual pairs of spacelike separated particles cannot be described by deterministic systems provided their mixture is the same for all choices of measurement settings. We reformulate and generalize the free will theorem in terms of systems of random variables and show that the proof is based on two observations: (1) Some compound systems are contextual (nonlocal), and (2) any deterministic system with spacelike separated components is nonsignaling. The contradiction between the two is obtained by showing that a mixture of nonsignaling deterministic systems, if they exist, is always noncontextual. The "experimenters' free will" (independence) assumption is not needed for the proof: It is made redundant by the assumption (1) above, critical for the proof. We next argue that the reason why an individual pair of particles is not described by a deterministic system is more elementary than in the free will theorem. A system, contextual or not and deterministic or not, includes several choices of settings, each of which can be factually used without changing the system. An individual pair of particles can only afford a single realization of random variables for a single choice of settings. With this conceptualization, the "free will of experimenters" cannot be even meaningfully formulated, and the choice between the determinism and "free will of particles" becomes arbitrary and inconsequential.
dc.identifier.eissn2643-1564
dc.identifier.jour-issn2643-1564
dc.identifier.olddbid182425
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/165519
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/57212
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042827289
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKujala, Janne
dc.okm.discipline112 Statistics and probabilityen_GB
dc.okm.discipline112 Tilastotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherAMER PHYSICAL SOC
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN 043288
dc.relation.doi10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043288
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPhysical Review Research
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume2
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/165519
dc.titleSystems of random variables and the free will theorem
dc.year.issued2020

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
PhysRevResearch.2.043288.pdf
Size:
200.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version