Using implementation science to bridge the gaps between political commitment and action in antimicrobial resistance governance under the one health approach in the WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions

dc.contributor.authorYu, Xiaoran
dc.contributor.authorWang, Huan
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jian
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Xin
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Xiaoding
dc.contributor.authorHe, Qiushui
dc.contributor.authorMokrousov, Igor
dc.contributor.authorSun, Lin
dc.contributor.authorDong, Yanhui
dc.contributor.authorZou, Zhiyong
dc.contributor.organizationfi=InFLAMES Lippulaiva|en=InFLAMES Flagship|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biolääketieteen laitos|en=Institute of Biomedicine|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.68445910604
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.77952289591
dc.converis.publication-id508400112
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/508400112
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T09:56:34Z
dc.date.available2026-01-27T09:56:34Z
dc.description.abstract<p>The WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions, home to more than half of the world's population, bear a disproportionate burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including some of the most severe resistance patterns. The convergence of rapidly growing economies and persistent health system challenges in these regions creates a critical platform for understanding the dynamics of AMR and developing scalable governance approaches relevant to other low- and middle-income countries. This Viewpoint reviews current progress in AMR governance globally and study regions, with a focus on country-specific National Action Plans, and highlights the discrepancies between policy intentions and actual implementation. Implementation science, developed to address research-to-practice gaps, provides a systematic framework for identifying and overcoming barriers to implementation, thereby translating political commitments into actionable interventions. Given the cross-sectoral complexity of AMR, we propose novel strategic priorities to enhance AMR governance by embedding implementation science within the One Health approach. This involves a four-step process: selecting and adapting evidence-based practices, assessing multilevel barriers and enablers, selecting, using and adapting implementation strategies, and evaluating and sustaining their impact. Together, this framework provides a blueprint for localising and operationalising overarching policy concepts into concrete, context-specific actions, with potential lessons for other regions globally.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn2666-6065
dc.identifier.olddbid214336
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/197354
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/39055
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101783
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601217006
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHe, Qiushui
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber101783
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101783
dc.relation.ispartofjournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
dc.relation.volume66
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/197354
dc.titleUsing implementation science to bridge the gaps between political commitment and action in antimicrobial resistance governance under the one health approach in the WHO Southeast Asia and Western Pacific regions
dc.year.issued2026

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Using_implementation_science_2025.pdf
Size:
3.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format