Assessment of cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being, and safety-promoting interventions : document analysis

dc.contributor.authorHalminen, Olli
dc.contributor.authorHult, Marja
dc.contributor.authorKallio, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorSuominen, Sakari
dc.contributor.authorLinna, Miika
dc.contributor.authorKangasniemi, Mari
dc.contributor.organizationfi=hoitotieteen laitos|en=Department of Nursing Science|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kansanterveystiede|en=Public Health|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.27201741504
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.94792640685
dc.converis.publication-id505514919
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/505514919
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T14:49:51Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T14:49:51Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Our objective was to identify and assess freely available web-based cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being, and safety-promoting interventions. Several characteristics of such calculators could enhance or hinder the use of calculators in new contexts, yet they remain insufficiently studied. <br></p><p>We used a qualitative document analysis method with multi-channel web search strategy which explored 2100 websites, and 5 potential calculators suggested by content experts, resulting in the inclusion of 17 calculators in our study. Data was analyzed by deductive-inductive strategy that considered their applicability and, for example, their target groups, topic fields, usability-related characteristics, and scientific evidence base. The study was conducted applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. <br></p><p>The characteristics of calculators were heterogenous, dependent on the context of their application and the target group of the calculator. Most calculators were clearly aimed at either employers, local public administrators, or policy makers. Cost-benefit analysis was the main method of analysis in 16 of the 17 calculators, and 12 of them included a comprehensive user manual. The scientific evidence base was explicated in 15 of the calculators, but the breadth of the evidence base varied widely between calculators. <br></p><p>A cost-effectiveness calculator’s contextual and practical applicability should be analyzed in addition to its scientific evidence base when considering its implementation.<br></p>
dc.format.pagerange341
dc.format.pagerange354
dc.identifier.eissn1798-0798
dc.identifier.olddbid213755
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/196773
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/55760
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.23996/fjhw.149356
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601216993
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHult, Marja
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKallio, Hanna
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorSuominen, Sakari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKangasniemi, Mari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline316 Nursingen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline316 Hoitotiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityDomestic publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSosiaali- ja terveyshuollon tietojenkäsittely-yhdistys
dc.publisher.countryFinlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySuomifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeFI
dc.relation.doi10.23996/fjhw.149356
dc.relation.ispartofjournalFinnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume17
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/196773
dc.titleAssessment of cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being, and safety-promoting interventions : document analysis
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
riaittam, FinJeHeW_2025_17_3_Halminen.pdf
Size:
353.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format