Microbiome confounders and quantitative profiling challenge predicted microbial targets in colorectal cancer development

dc.contributor.authorTito Raúl Y.
dc.contributor.authorVerbandt Sara
dc.contributor.authorAguirre Vazquez Marta
dc.contributor.authorLahti Leo
dc.contributor.authorVerspecht Chloe
dc.contributor.authorLloréns-Rico Verónica
dc.contributor.authorVieira-Silva Sara
dc.contributor.authorArts Janine
dc.contributor.authorFalony Gwen
dc.contributor.authorDekker Evelien
dc.contributor.authorReumers Joke
dc.contributor.authorTejpar Sabine
dc.contributor.authorJeroen Raes
dc.contributor.organizationfi=data-analytiikka|en=Data-analytiikka|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.68940835793
dc.converis.publication-id393447487
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/393447487
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:12:55Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:12:55Z
dc.description.abstractDespite substantial progress in cancer microbiome research, recognized confounders and advances in absolute microbiome quantification remain underused; this raises concerns regarding potential spurious associations. Here we study the fecal microbiota of 589 patients at different colorectal cancer (CRC) stages and compare observations with up to 15 published studies (4,439 patients and controls total). Using quantitative microbiome profiling based on 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing, combined with rigorous confounder control, we identified transit time, fecal calprotectin (intestinal inflammation) and body mass index as primary microbial covariates, superseding variance explained by CRC diagnostic groups. Well-established microbiome CRC targets, such as Fusobacterium nucleatum, did not significantly associate with CRC diagnostic groups (healthy, adenoma and carcinoma) when controlling for these covariates. In contrast, the associations of Anaerococcus vaginalis, Dialister pneumosintes, Parvimonas micra, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica and Prevotella intermedia remained robust, highlighting their future target potential. Finally, control individuals (age 22-80 years, mean 57.7 years, standard deviation 11.3) meeting criteria for colonoscopy (for example, through a positive fecal immunochemical test) but without colonic lesions are enriched for the dysbiotic Bacteroides2 enterotype, emphasizing uncertainties in defining healthy controls in cancer microbiome research. Together, these results indicate the importance of quantitative microbiome profiling and covariate control for biomarker identification in CRC microbiome studies.
dc.format.pagerange1339
dc.format.pagerange1348
dc.identifier.eissn1546-170X
dc.identifier.jour-issn1078-8956
dc.identifier.olddbid205395
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188422
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54304
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-02963-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790937
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLahti, Leo
dc.okm.discipline217 Medical engineeringen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biomedicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3122 Cancersen_GB
dc.okm.discipline217 Lääketieteen tekniikkafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biolääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3122 Syöpätauditfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.doi10.1038/s41591-024-02963-2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNature Medicine
dc.relation.issue5
dc.relation.volume30
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188422
dc.titleMicrobiome confounders and quantitative profiling challenge predicted microbial targets in colorectal cancer development
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s41591-024-02963-2.pdf
Size:
7.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format