Learning how to understand complexity and deal with sustainability challenges – A framework for a comprehensive approach and its application in university education

dc.contributor.authorR. Willamo
dc.contributor.authorL. Helenius
dc.contributor.authorC. Holmström
dc.contributor.authorL. Haapanen
dc.contributor.authorV. Sandström
dc.contributor.authorE. Huotari
dc.contributor.authorK. Kaarre
dc.contributor.authorU. Värre
dc.contributor.authorA. Nuotiomäki
dc.contributor.authorJ. Happonen
dc.contributor.authorL. Kolehmainen
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus|en=Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36987167164
dc.converis.publication-id29249510
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/29249510
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T13:37:00Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T13:37:00Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Sustainability challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, poverty and rapid urbanization are complex and strongly interrelated. In order to successfully deal with these challenges, we need comprehensive approaches that integrate knowledge from multiple disciplines and perspectives and emphasize interconnections. In short, they aid in observing matters in a wider perspective without losing an understanding of the details. In order to teach and learn a comprehensive approach, we need to better understand what comprehensive thinking actually is. In this paper, we present a conceptual framework for a comprehensive approach, termed the GHH framework. The framework comprises three dimensions: generalism, holism, and holarchism. It contributes to the academic community’s understanding of comprehensive thinking and it can be used for integrating comprehensive thinking into education. Also, practical examples of the application of the framework in university teaching are presented. We argue that an ideal approach to sustainability challenges and complexity in general is a balanced, dialectical combination of comprehensive and differentiative approaches. The current dominance of specialization, or the differentiative approach, in university education calls for a stronger emphasis on comprehensive thinking skills. Comprehensiveness should not be considered as a flawed approach, but should instead be considered as important an aspect in education as specialized and differentiative skills.</p>
dc.format.pagerange1
dc.format.pagerange13
dc.identifier.jour-issn0304-3800
dc.identifier.olddbid183126
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/166220
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/40482
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.011
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042718584
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHaapanen, Liisa
dc.okm.discipline1172 Environmental sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline520 Other social sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1172 Ympäristötiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline520 Muut yhteiskuntatieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.011
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEcological Modelling
dc.relation.issue24 February 2018
dc.relation.volume370
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/166220
dc.titleLearning how to understand complexity and deal with sustainability challenges – A framework for a comprehensive approach and its application in university education
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Willamo ym 2018.pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author's postprint (but not proof-checked)