Convolutional neural networks for tumor segmentation by cancer type and imaging modality: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorRainio, Oona
dc.contributor.authorKlén, Riku
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PET-keskus|en=Turku PET Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.14646305228
dc.converis.publication-id499242347
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/499242347
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:20:21Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:20:21Z
dc.description.abstract<p>During the last few decades, a convolutional neural network (CNN) has become a very popular deep learning technique in automatic tumor segmentation of medical images of cancer patients. However, unlike for semantic segmentation of regular photographs, there are few publicly available datasets that can be used to train a CNN to perform tumor segmentation in medical images. Consequently, it is difficult to compare these methods or tell how well they should work for a specific combination of cancer type and imaging modality when trained with a certain amount of data. To answer this question, we analyzed 325 recent articles about CNNs trained for tumor segmentation in order to give a comprehensive overview of the current state of research. The articles study several different types of cancer, including brain tumors and breast, liver, lung, skin, head and neck, prostate, thyroid, cervical, colorectal, pancreatic, kidney, and bladder cancer, imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and other similar modalities. According to our analysis, the most popular CNN for tumor segmentation is U-Net and its new modifications. Conversely, Mask region-based CNNs are rarely used outside of MRI images. Out of the other CNN designs, SegNet and DeepLabV3 are most common but still significantly less studied than U-Net. Furthermore, several methods have not yet been tested for rarer types of cancer.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2192-6670
dc.identifier.jour-issn2192-6662
dc.identifier.olddbid208949
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/191976
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/36369
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13721-025-00556-8
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082792195
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRainio, Oona
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKlén, Riku
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.publisher.countryAustriaen_GB
dc.publisher.countryItävaltafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeAT
dc.relation.articlenumber58
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s13721-025-00556-8
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNetwork Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics
dc.relation.volume14
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/191976
dc.titleConvolutional neural networks for tumor segmentation by cancer type and imaging modality: a systematic review
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Rainio_etal_convolutional_neural_2025.pdf
Size:
976.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format