World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule versus Functional Independence Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury

dc.contributor.authorTarvonen-Schröder Sinikka
dc.contributor.authorKoivisto Mari
dc.contributor.organizationfi=biostatistiikka|en=Biostatistics|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kliiniset neurotieteet|en=Clinical Neurosciences|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.89365200099
dc.contributor.organization-code2607314
dc.converis.publication-id380664464
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/380664464
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T03:37:58Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T03:37:58Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Objective: In patients with traumatic brain injury, to compare functioning measured using the 12-item patient and proxy World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-12) with assessments made by professionals.</p><p>Patients and methods: At discharge from rehabilitation, 89 consecutive patients with traumatic brain injury (10 mild, 36 moderate, 43 severe) and their proxies completed the WHODAS-12. Professionals assessed functioning simultaneously using the WHO minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health and Functional Independence Measure (FIM).</p><p>Results: From mild to severe traumatic brain injury, increasing disability was found in: sum, component and item scores of patient and proxy WHODAS, except for emotional functions in patients’ ratings; in sum and item scores of the WHO minimal generic data-set, except for pain; and in FIM total score and sub-scores. The WHODAS participation component was more impaired than activities. Although proxies rated functioning more impaired than patients, the correlation between patient and proxy WHODAS was strong (0.74). The correlation between patient/proxy WHODAS and FIM was also strong (–0.56 and –0.78, respectively). Proxy WHODAS differentiated mild and moderate traumatic brain injury more accurately than the other assessments.</p><p>Conclusion: We recommend using the WHODAS-12 when planning patient- and family-oriented rehabilitation services after traumatic brain injury.</p>
dc.identifier.eissn1651-2081
dc.identifier.jour-issn1650-1977
dc.identifier.olddbid210926
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/193953
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/56717
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v55.16274
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082786773
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorTarvonen-Schröder, Sinikka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKoivisto, Mari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational healthen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3142 Kansanterveystiede, ympäristö ja työterveysfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMedical Journals Sweden
dc.publisher.countrySwedenen_GB
dc.publisher.countryRuotsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeSE
dc.relation.articlenumberjrm16274
dc.relation.doi10.2340/jrm.v55.16274
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
dc.relation.volume55
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/193953
dc.titleWorld Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule versus Functional Independence Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Tarvonen-SchröderEtAl2023WorldHealth.pdf
Size:
326.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format