Ligasure Impact™ to Reduce Complications After Abdominoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

dc.contributor.authorGiordano, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorKorhonen, Veera
dc.contributor.authorSalval, Andre’
dc.contributor.authordi Summa, Pietro G.
dc.contributor.authorOranges, Carlo Maria
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kirurgia|en=Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.97295082107
dc.converis.publication-id500287344
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/500287344
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T12:39:42Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T12:39:42Z
dc.description.abstract<p>BackgroundThe optimal dissection technique for flap elevation in abdominoplasty remains debated, particularly in high-risk patients after massive weight loss. The LigaSure Impact™ (LS) vessel-sealing system (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) is an advanced energy device used across surgical disciplines to reduce morbidity. This meta-analysis compares LS with conventional techniques to assess its effectiveness in abdominoplasty.MethodA systematic literature search identified relevant studies comparing LS with standard methods. Primary outcome was the overall postoperative complications' rate; secondary outcomes included specific wound complications, operative time, and hospital stay.StatisticsA random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for categorical outcomes; mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.ResultsThe search yielded 3 studies totaling 205 patients. LS significantly reduced overall complication rates compared to controls (RD = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.32, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Hematoma and wound dehiscence incidences were significantly lower (<em>P</em> = 0.03 and <em>P</em> = 0.01, respectively). No significant differences were observed for seroma, infection, or fat/flap necrosis. LS use was also associated with reduced re-operation rates and shorter hospital stays, though operative time was comparable.DiscussionLS may improve surgical outcomes in post-weight-loss abdominoplasty patients by reducing complications and hospitalization. However, the limited number of studies and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation.ConclusionPreliminary evidence suggests that LS may offer potential benefits in abdominoplasty; however, current findings should be interpreted with caution because of limited quality and heterogeneity of available studies. Further research is needed. <br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1553-3514
dc.identifier.jour-issn1553-3506
dc.identifier.olddbid212807
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/195825
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/53465
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251374484
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe202601217145
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGiordano, Salvatore
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKorhonen, Veera
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumber15533506251374484
dc.relation.doi10.1177/15533506251374484
dc.relation.ispartofjournalSurgical Innovation
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/195825
dc.titleLigasure Impact™ to Reduce Complications After Abdominoplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
dc.year.issued2025

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
giordano-et-al-2025-ligasure-impacttm-to-reduce-complications-after-abdominoplasty-a-meta-analysis-of-comparative.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format