Continuous auditing of artificial intelligence: a conceptualization and assessment of tools and frameworks

dc.contributor.authorMinkkinen Matti
dc.contributor.authorLaine Joakim
dc.contributor.authorMäntymäki Matti
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tietojärjestelmätiede|en=Information Systems Science|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tulevaisuuden tutkimuskeskus|en=Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.36987167164
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.70128852004
dc.converis.publication-id178211780
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/178211780
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:00:52Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:00:52Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Artificial intelligence (AI), which refers to both a research field and a set of technologies, is rapidly growing and has already spread to application areas ranging from policing to healthcare and transport. The increasing AI capabilities bring novel risks and potential harms to individuals and societies, which auditing of AI seeks to address. However, traditional periodic or cyclical auditing is challenged by the learning and adaptive nature of AI systems. Meanwhile, continuous auditing (CA) has been discussed since the 1980s but has not been explicitly connected to auditing of AI. In this paper, we connect the research on auditing of AI and CA to introduce CA of AI (CAAI). We define CAAI as a (nearly) real-time electronic support system for auditors that continuously and automatically audits an AI system to assess its consistency with relevant norms and standards. We adopt a bottom-up approach and investigate the CAAI tools and methods found in the academic and grey literature. The suitability of tools and methods for CA is assessed based on criteria derived from CA definitions. Our study findings indicate that few existing frameworks are directly suitable for CAAI and that many have limited scope within a particular sector or problem area. Hence, further work on CAAI frameworks is needed, and researchers can draw lessons from existing CA frameworks; however, this requires consideration of the scope of CAAI, the human–machine division of labour, and the emerging institutional landscape in AI governance. Our work also lays the foundation for continued research and practical applications within the field of CAAI.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2731-4669
dc.identifier.jour-issn2731-4650
dc.identifier.olddbid203218
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/186245
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/29175
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-00022-2
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023020125334
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMinkkinen, Matti
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLaine, Joakim
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorMäntymäki, Matti
dc.okm.discipline113 Computer and information sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline520 Other social sciencesen_GB
dc.okm.discipline113 Tietojenkäsittely ja informaatiotieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.discipline520 Muut yhteiskuntatieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s44206-022-00022-2
dc.relation.ispartofjournalDigital society
dc.relation.issue3
dc.relation.volume1
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/186245
dc.titleContinuous auditing of artificial intelligence: a conceptualization and assessment of tools and frameworks
dc.year.issued2022

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s44206-022-00022-2.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format