Antecedents of organizational creativity: drivers, barriers or both?

dc.contributor.authorAnnika Blomberg
dc.contributor.authorTomi Kallio
dc.contributor.authorHeikki Pohjanpää
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Porin yksikkö|en=Pori Unit|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=Turun ihmistieteiden tutkijakollegium (TIAS)|en=Turku Institute for Advanced Studies (TIAS)|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.85476593059
dc.contributor.organization-code2601230
dc.converis.publication-id20576974
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/20576974
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:34:49Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:34:49Z
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper reviews academic journal articles and scholarly books focusing on organizational creativity and constructs a schematic representation of the antecedents of organizational creativity, i.e. of the associated drivers and barriers. The literature on organizational creativity is reviewed using a traditional review technique. The focus is especially on more recent developments of the discourse, and therefore this work can be labeled as a stateof-the-art review. The review shows that drivers have clearly been studied more extensively than barriers. It was also recognized that the predominant approach among organizational creativity scholars is to dichotomize the factors influencing organizational creativity, more specifically to discuss the antecedents of creativity mostly from the viewpoint of drivers. In some cases, the antecedents are discussed from the perspective of barriers, but only rarely has it been recognized that the very same factor may either enhance or inhibit creativity. In this paper, such factors are called ‘either-or factors’. The paper suggests that the organizational creativity discourse should acknowledge that it is not enough to understand what enhances organizational creativity but also which kind of issues inhibit it and, especially, which factors may work either against or toward creativity under different circumstances. The review suggests that the majority of factors are most likely either-or by nature, although it has been overlooked in the discourse due to the dichotomizing tendency.</p>
dc.format.pagerange104
dc.format.pagerange78
dc.identifier.jour-issn2183-0606
dc.identifier.olddbid189087
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/172181
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/44083
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.open-jim.org/article/view/248
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042716772
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorBlomberg, Annika
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKallio, Tomi
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisher.countryPortugalen_GB
dc.publisher.countryPortugalifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codePT
dc.publisher.placePorto
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Innovation Management
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume5
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/172181
dc.titleAntecedents of organizational creativity: drivers, barriers or both?
dc.year.issued2017

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
BLomberg, Kallio, POhjanpää 2017.pdf
Size:
1.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format