Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

dc.contributor.authorSmith Katharine A.
dc.contributor.authorBlease Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorFaurholt-Jepsen Maria
dc.contributor.authorFirth Joseph
dc.contributor.authorVan Daele Tom
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCarlbring Per
dc.contributor.authorEbner-Priemer Ulrich W.
dc.contributor.authorKoutsouleris Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorRiper Heleen
dc.contributor.authorMouchabac Stephane
dc.contributor.authorTorous John
dc.contributor.authorCipriani Andrea
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykiatria|en=Psychiatry|
dc.converis.publication-id181285179
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/181285179
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T22:20:16Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T22:20:16Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Digital innovations in mental health offer great potential, but present unique challenges. Using a consensus development panel approach, an expert, international, cross-disciplinary panel met to provide a framework to conceptualise digital mental health innovations, research into mechanisms and effectiveness and approaches for clinical implementation. Key questions and outputs from the group were agreed by consensus, and are presented and discussed in the text and supported by case examples in an accompanying appendix. A number of key themes emerged. (1) Digital approaches may work best across traditional diagnostic systems: we do not have effective ontologies of mental illness and transdiagnostic/symptom-based approaches may be more fruitful. (2) Approaches in clinical implementation of digital tools/interventions need to be creative and require organisational change: not only do clinicians and patients need training and education to be more confident and skilled in using digital technologies to support shared care decision-making, but traditional roles need to be extended, with clinicians working alongside digital navigators and non-clinicians who are delivering protocolised treatments. (3) Designing appropriate studies to measure the effectiveness of implementation is also key: including digital data raises unique ethical issues, and measurement of potential harms is only just beginning. (4) Accessibility and codesign are needed to ensure innovations are long lasting. (5) Standardised guidelines for reporting would ensure effective synthesis of the evidence to inform clinical implementation. COVID-19 and the transition to virtual consultations have shown us the potential for digital innovations to improve access and quality of care in mental health: now is the ideal time to act.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn2755-9734
dc.identifier.jour-issn2755-9734
dc.identifier.olddbid202009
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/185036
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/41917
dc.identifier.urlhttps://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/26/1/e300670
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082785582
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, Psykiatria
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurology and psychiatryen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3124 Neurologia ja psykiatriafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA2 Scientific Article
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.articlenumbere300670
dc.relation.doi10.1136/bmjment-2023-300670
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMJ Mental Health
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume26
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/185036
dc.titleDigital mental health: challenges and next steps
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
e300670.full.pdf
Size:
456.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format