Comparison of ethanol tolerance between potential cyanobacterial production hosts

dc.contributor.authorJari Kämäräinen
dc.contributor.authorMatts Nylund
dc.contributor.authorEva-Mari Aro
dc.contributor.authorPauli Kallio
dc.contributor.organizationfi=molekulaarinen kasvibiologia|en=Molecular Plant Biology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.50535969575
dc.contributor.organization-code2606205
dc.converis.publication-id35786081
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/35786081
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T12:09:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T12:09:02Z
dc.description.abstractCyanobacteria are photosynthetic prokaryotes that have been extensively studied as potential autotrophic biotechnological hosts for the production of different carbon-based end-products directly from atmospheric CO2. While commercially competitive applications do not yet exist, the production of ethanol in cyanobacteria is the most mature technology, endorsed by relatively high production yields and established status of ethanol in the global biofuel market. Within this concept, the aim here was to systematically compare ethanol tolerance of different commonly used cyanobacterial strains and substrains, in order to assess their relative potential for biotechnological production platforms. The comparison revealed clear strain-specific differences in ethanol toxicity, with growth inhibition GI(50 )values ranging between 3 gL(-1) (0.4% V/V) and 28 g L-1 (3.5% V/V). The most tolerant wild-type strains were Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (substrain A) and Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, which did not show any apparent effect in growth below ethanol concentrations 9.2 gL(-1 )(1.2% V/V). In comparison to typical biotechnological yeast strains used for ethanol fermentation, these values are clearly lower but still around the same order of magnitude. The results also underlined the challenges in direct number-based comparison between cyanobacterial strains and culture conditions due to inconsistencies in respect to chlorophyll content, cell morphology and optical properties.
dc.format.pagerange140
dc.format.pagerange145
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4863
dc.identifier.jour-issn0168-1656
dc.identifier.olddbid173522
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/156616
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/32424
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719711
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKämäräinen, Jari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorNylund, Matts
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorAro, Eva-Mari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorKallio, Pauli
dc.okm.discipline1183 Plant biology, microbiology, virologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1183 Kasvibiologia, mikrobiologia, virologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.publisher.countryNetherlandsen_GB
dc.publisher.countryAlankomaatfi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeNL
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.034
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Biotechnology
dc.relation.volume283
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/156616
dc.titleComparison of ethanol tolerance between potential cyanobacterial production hosts
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0168165618305741-main.pdf
Size:
591.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher's version