Reading compound words in Finnish and Chinese: An eye-tracking study

dc.contributor.authorHyönä Jukka
dc.contributor.authorCui Lei
dc.contributor.authorHeikkilä Timo T.
dc.contributor.authorParanko Birgitta
dc.contributor.authorGao Yun
dc.contributor.authorSu Xingzhi
dc.contributor.organizationfi=PET-keskus|en=Turku PET Centre|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=psykologia|en=Psychology|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.14646305228
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.15586825505
dc.converis.publication-id181493129
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/181493129
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-27T23:28:58Z
dc.date.available2025-08-27T23:28:58Z
dc.description.abstract<p>Two eye-tracking experiments in alphabetic Finnish and two in logographic Chinese examined the recognition of two-constituent compound words in reading. In Finnish, two-constituent compound words vary greatly in length, whereas in Chinese they are identical in length. According to the visual acuity principle (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X23000736?dgcid=rss_sd_all#b0020">Bertram & Hyönä, 2003</a>), short Finnish compound words and all two-character Chinese compound words that fit in foveal vision are recognized holistically, whereas long Finnish compound words are recognized via components. Experiment 1 in Finnish provided evidence consistent with the account, whereas the results for long compound words presented in condensed font in Experiment 2 were inconsistent with it. In Chinese, the first-character frequency effect was non-significant even when the compound words were presented in large font. The Finnish results suggest that componential processing is necessary when the compound word entails more than 10 letters. The Chinese results are compatible with the Chinese Reading Model (<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X23000736?dgcid=rss_sd_all#b0105">Li & Pollatsek, 2020</a>) that assumes whole-word representations to overrule the activation of components during compound word recognition.<br></p>
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0821
dc.identifier.jour-issn0749-596X
dc.identifier.olddbid204046
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/187073
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/52114
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104474
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790320
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHyönä, Jukka
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorHeikkilä, Timo
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorParanko, Birgitta
dc.okm.discipline515 Psychologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline515 Psykologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumber104474
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jml.2023.104474
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Memory and Language
dc.relation.volume134
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/187073
dc.titleReading compound words in Finnish and Chinese: An eye-tracking study
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
1-s2.0-S0749596X23000736-main.pdf
Size:
2.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format