Social and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice

dc.contributor.authorRaulo, Aura
dc.contributor.authorBürkner, Paul-Christian
dc.contributor.authorFinerty, Genevieve E.
dc.contributor.authorDale, Jarrah
dc.contributor.authorHanski, Eveliina
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Holly M.
dc.contributor.authorLamberth, Curt
dc.contributor.authorFirth, Josh A.
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, Tim
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, Sarah C. L.
dc.contributor.organizationfi=data-analytiikka|en=Data-analytiikka|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.68940835793
dc.converis.publication-id393447857
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/393447857
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T00:15:04Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T00:15:04Z
dc.description.abstractGut microbes shape many aspects of organismal biology, yet how these key bacteria transmit among hosts in natural populations remains poorly understood. Recent work in mammals has emphasized either transmission through social contacts or indirect transmission through environmental contact, but the relative importance of different routes has not been directly assessed. Here we used a novel radio-frequency identification-based tracking system to collect long-term high-resolution data on social relationships, space use and microhabitat in a wild population of mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), while regularly characterizing their gut microbiota with 16S ribosomal RNA profiling. Through probabilistic modelling of the resulting data, we identify positive and statistically distinct signals of social and environmental transmission, captured by social networks and overlap in home ranges, respectively. Strikingly, microorganisms with distinct biological attributes drove these different transmission signals. While the social network effect on microbiota was driven by anaerobic bacteria, the effect of shared space was most influenced by aerotolerant spore-forming bacteria. These findings support the prediction that social contact is important for the transfer of microorganisms with low oxygen tolerance, while those that can tolerate oxygen or form spores may be able to transmit indirectly through the environment. Overall, these results suggest social and environmental transmission routes can spread biologically distinct members of the mammalian gut microbiota.
dc.format.pagerange972
dc.format.pagerange985
dc.identifier.eissn2397-334X
dc.identifier.jour-issn2397-334X
dc.identifier.olddbid205476
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/188503
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/54693
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02381-0
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2025082790956
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRaulo, Aura
dc.okm.discipline1183 Plant biology, microbiology, virologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1184 Genetics, developmental biology, physiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biomedicineen_GB
dc.okm.discipline413 Veterinary scienceen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1183 Kasvibiologia, mikrobiologia, virologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline1184 Genetiikka, kehitysbiologia, fysiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.discipline3111 Biolääketieteetfi_FI
dc.okm.discipline413 Eläinlääketiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationinternational co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.publisher.countryUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.publisher.countryBritanniafi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeGB
dc.relation.doi10.1038/s41559-024-02381-0
dc.relation.ispartofjournalNature Ecology and Evolution
dc.relation.volume8
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/188503
dc.titleSocial and environmental transmission spread different sets of gut microbes in wild mice
dc.year.issued2024

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
s41559-024-02381-0.pdf
Size:
5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format