Increased male bias in eider ducks can be explained by sex-specific survival of prime-age breeders

dc.contributor.authorSatu Ramula
dc.contributor.authorMarkus Öst
dc.contributor.authorAndreas Lindén
dc.contributor.authorPatrik Karell
dc.contributor.authorMikael Kilpi
dc.contributor.organizationfi=ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia|en=Ecology and Evolutionary Biology |
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.20415010352
dc.converis.publication-id31089567
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/31089567
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:02:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:02:43Z
dc.description.abstractIn contrast to theoretical predictions of even adult sex ratios, males are dominating in many bird populations. Such bias among adults may be critical to population growth and viability. Nevertheless, demographic mechanisms for biased adult sex ratios are still poorly understood. Here, we examined potential demographic mechanisms for the recent dramatic shift from a slight female bias among adult eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to a male bias (about 65% males) in the Baltic Sea, where the species is currently declining. We analysed a nine-year dataset on offspring sex ratio at hatching based on molecularly sexed ducklings of individually known mothers. Moreover, using demographic data from long-term individual-based capture-recapture records, we investigated how sex-specific survival at different ages after fledgling can modify the adult sex ratio. More specifically, we constructed a stochastic two-sex matrix population model and simulated scenarios of different survival probabilities for males and females. We found that sex ratio at hatching was slightly female-biased (52.8%) and therefore unlikely to explain the observed male bias among adult birds. Our stochastic simulations with higher survival for males than for females revealed that despite a slight female bias at hatching, study populations shifted to a male-biased adult sex ratio (> 60% males) in a few decades. This shift was driven by prime reproductive-age individuals(>5-year-old), with sex-specific survival of younger age classes playing a minor role. Hence, different age classes contributed disproportion ally to population dynamics. We argue that an alternative explanation for the observed male dominance among adults sex-biased dispersal can be considered redundant and is unlikely, given the ecology of the species. The present study highlights the importance of considering population structure and age-specific vital rates when assessing population dynamics and management targets.
dc.identifier.jour-issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.olddbid185924
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/169018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/42726
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042719100
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorRamula, Satu
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ecology, evolutionary biologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline1181 Ekologia, evoluutiobiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
dc.publisher.countryUnited Statesen_GB
dc.publisher.countryYhdysvallat (USA)fi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeUS
dc.relation.articlenumberARTN e0195415
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0195415
dc.relation.ispartofjournalPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issue4
dc.relation.volume13
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/169018
dc.titleIncreased male bias in eider ducks can be explained by sex-specific survival of prime-age breeders
dc.year.issued2018

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
PLoS_ONE_article.pdf
Size:
2.34 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format