Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research

dc.contributor.authorKari Lukka
dc.contributor.authorEija Vinnari
dc.contributor.organizationfi=laskentatoimi ja rahoitus|en=Accounting and Finance|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.32184342841
dc.contributor.organization-code2608101
dc.converis.publication-id1599014
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/1599014
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-28T14:05:36Z
dc.date.available2022-10-28T14:05:36Z
dc.description.abstract<div> <div> <div> <h5> Purpose</h5> </div> </div> &ndash; The purpose of this paper is to distinguish two roles of theories, domain theory and method theory, and examine their relationships in management accounting research. Are these two roles explicitly distinguished in management accounting studies? Can this be achieved in an unambiguous manner? Where do ambitions for theoretical contribution lie in management accounting studies that employ method theories?</div> <br /> <div> <a name="_i2"></a> <div> <div> <h5> Design/methodology/approach</h5> </div> </div> &ndash; The authors develop a conceptual framework for analysing possible relationships between domain theories and method theories in studies and illustrate the theoretical arguments with examples from management accounting studies employing Actor-Network Theory (ANT) as their method theory.</div> <br /> <div> <a name="_i3"></a> <div> <div> <h5> Findings</h5> </div> </div> &ndash; There can be various types of relationships between domain theories and method theories, and the theoretical ambition of the analysed studies typically focused on domain theories. However, ambiguity can exist with regard to the location of a study&#39;s theoretical ambition. Both domain theories and method theories tend to be moving fields, and their interaction can add to this feature.</div> <br /> <div> <a name="_i4"></a> <div> <div> <h5> Research limitations/implications</h5> </div> </div> &ndash; The suggested conceptual clarification assists in the reconciliation of extreme perspectives that relate to management accounting and theory. It will also help researchers to systematically design their own work and evaluate that of others. An increased understanding of how a field develops as a result of interaction with method theories might perhaps alleviate concerns regarding the value of mobilizing the latter.</div> <br /> <div> <a name="_i5"></a> <div> <div> <h5> Originality/value</h5> </div> </div> &ndash; The analysis contributes to the on-going debate on the value and effects of employing method theories, or theoretical lenses, in management accounting research.</div> <p> &nbsp;</p>
dc.format.pagerange1308
dc.format.pagerange1338
dc.identifier.jour-issn1368-0668
dc.identifier.olddbid186215
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/169309
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/34386
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2021042714197
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorLukka, Kari
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorVinnari, Eija
dc.okm.discipline512 Business and managementen_GB
dc.okm.discipline512 Liiketaloustiedefi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
dc.relation.articlenumberAAAJ
dc.relation.doi10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
dc.relation.issue8
dc.relation.volume27
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/169309
dc.titleDomain theory and method theory in management accounting research
dc.year.issued2014

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
Lukka & Vinnari_Domain theory and method theory_RG version.pdf
Size:
979.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format