Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Decrease the Need for Any Surgical Procedure for Chronic Epicondylitis versus Conservative Treatment-A Comparative Study with Long-Term Follow-Up

dc.contributor.authorAnnaniemi Juho Aleksi
dc.contributor.authorPere Jüri
dc.contributor.authorGiordano Salvatore
dc.contributor.organizationfi=kirurgia|en=Surgery|
dc.contributor.organizationfi=tyks, vsshp|en=tyks, varha|
dc.contributor.organization-code1.2.246.10.2458963.20.97295082107
dc.contributor.organization-code2607309
dc.converis.publication-id178385236
dc.converis.urlhttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/178385236
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T03:06:27Z
dc.date.available2025-08-28T03:06:27Z
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections may alleviate symptoms of chronic medial or lateral epicondylitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a total of 55 patients with chronic ME or LE who had undergone at least 6 months of any conservative treatment before intervention. The patients were divided into two groups: the PRP group (<em>n</em> = 25), who received a single injection of autologous PRP to the medial or lateral epicondyle, and the PT group (<em>n</em> = 30), who continued with PT and pain medication. The primary outcome measures were pain and functional outcomes measured in terms of the following: Patient Related Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), which were detected at preintervention, 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included complications and the need for any surgery at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome measurements showed significantly better results favoring the PRP group (6-month PRTEE total 43.2 ± 19.2 vs. 62.8 ± 24.0, <em>p</em> < 0.001; 12-month PRTEE total 6.9 ± 15.0 vs. 28.1 ± 24.4, <em>p</em> < 0.001; 24-month PRTEE total 4.8 ± 9.8 vs. 12.7 ± 14.5, <em>p</em> = 0.029), and significantly better results in VAS and DASH sub-scores. The PRP group required significantly fewer surgical procedures (<em>n</em> = 0/0% vs. <em>n</em> = 6/20%, <em>p</em> = 0.027) at follow-up (mean 38.3 ± 12.3 months), and one case of prolonged pain after injection was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent PRP injections for epicondylitis resulted in better pain and functional outcomes compared to physiotherapy, and this improvement lasted at least 24 months. They required fewer surgical procedures and achieved faster recovery than the PT group. We recommend PRP for chronic epicondylitis of the elbow before considering surgery when other treatments have failed.</p>
dc.identifier.olddbid210208
dc.identifier.oldhandle10024/193235
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/11111/50964
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi-fe2023020325649
dc.language.isoen
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorAnnaniemi, Aleksi
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorGiordano, Salvatore
dc.okm.affiliatedauthorDataimport, tyks, vsshp
dc.okm.discipline3126 Surgery, anesthesiology, intensive care, radiologyen_GB
dc.okm.discipline3126 Kirurgia, anestesiologia, tehohoito, radiologiafi_FI
dc.okm.internationalcopublicationnot an international co-publication
dc.okm.internationalityInternational publication
dc.okm.typeA1 ScientificArticle
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.publisher.countrySwitzerlanden_GB
dc.publisher.countrySveitsifi_FI
dc.publisher.country-codeCH
dc.relation.articlenumber102
dc.relation.doi10.3390/jcm12010102
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.relation.issue1
dc.relation.volume12
dc.source.identifierhttps://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/193235
dc.titlePlatelet-Rich Plasma Injections Decrease the Need for Any Surgical Procedure for Chronic Epicondylitis versus Conservative Treatment-A Comparative Study with Long-Term Follow-Up
dc.year.issued2023

Tiedostot

Näytetään 1 - 1 / 1
Ladataan...
Name:
jcm-12-00102.pdf
Size:
990.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format